|
Dec. 09, 2020 |
|
|
June. 01, 2023 |
|
|
jRCTs072200063 |
Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of the bio-degradable membrane made of L-lactide/e- caprolactone co-polymers for guided bone regeneration: comparative study with collagen membrane |
|
Comparative study of the safety and efficacy of the bio-degradable membranes for guided bone regeneration |
|
Aug. 01, 2022 |
|
20 |
|
Patients with malocclusion and alveolar bone atrophy due to tooth loss who need to have their occlusion reconstructed by dental implants, and who are visiting Nagasaki University Hospital Oral and Maxillofacial Implant Center and Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Department |
|
Done followed by the protocol. |
|
None. |
|
Group A: T1-T2 of the augmented bone width at 1 mm from the reference line was 0.73 and 0.83 mm in collagen and P(LA/CL) groups. That was 0.78 and 0.49 mm at 3 and 6 mm in P(LA/CL) group. This tendency was same as the collagen group. The absorbable ratios were 30.9 % and 31.8% at 1 mm in collagen and P(LA/CL) groups. Group B: The biggest absorbable rate was found at 1 mm in both collage and P(LA/CL) groups. The augmented bone width was 2.67 and 1.63 mm at T1 and T2, and the absorbable ratio was 45.9% at 1 mm in collagen group. On the other hand, The augmented bone width was 1.87 and 1.44 mm at T1 and T2, and the absorbable ratio was 19.9% at 1 mm in P(LA/CL) group. The absorbable ratio at all points in P(LA/CL) group was lower than that in collagen group even if there was no significant difference. Group C: The bone absorbable ratios were horizontally 44.2 and 43.4% at 1 and 3mm in collagen group. In P(LA/CL) group, those were 29.1 and 18.9 %. The horizontal bone absorbable ratio in P(LA/CL) group showed lower than that in collagen group even if there was no significant difference. The bone height was decreased by 33.5% and 22.0% in collagen and P(LA/CL) groups. There was no significant difference between two group. |
|
The osteogenic potential of GBR with P(LA/CL) was non-inferior to that with collagen. |
|
June. 01, 2023 |
No |
|
None. |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs072200063 |
Seigo Ohba |
||
Nagasaki University Hospital |
||
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken |
||
+81-95-819-7704 |
||
sohba@nagasaki-u.ac.jp |
||
Ohba Seigo |
||
Nagasaki University Hospital |
||
1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken |
||
+81-95-819-7704 |
||
sohba@nagasaki-u.ac.jp |
Complete |
Dec. 09, 2020 |
||
| Feb. 03, 2021 | ||
| 20 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Patients who require alveolar ridge augmentation with GBR for oral rehabilitation using dental implants |
||
1. Patients who have sever blood diseases |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 90age old not | ||
Both |
||
Alveolar bone atrophy |
||
Bone biopsy is performed for category 3 subjects |
||
Efficacy: Amount of bone formation evaluated by CT analysis |
||
Safety and Efficacy evaluated by ISQ value of dental implants and histrogical evalusation with bone biopsy |
||
| GC Corporation | |
| Not applicable |
| The Clinical Research Review Board in Nagasaki University | |
| 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki-ken, Nagasaki | |
+81-95-819-7229 |
|
| gaibushikin@ml.nagasaki-u.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
Oct. 30, 2020 |
| なし |
none |