|
Dec. 06, 2021 |
|
|
Dec. 27, 2025 |
|
|
jRCTs011210055 |
A multicenter study to explore the benefit of patient-reported outcome (PRO:ePRO/paper-PRO) monitoring in the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma with cabozantinib. |
|
Cabozantinib ePRO study |
|
Feb. 15, 2024 |
|
108 |
|
In this study, the full analysis set (FAS) was defined as the analysis set, and the primary analysis set for efficacy and safety analyses was defined as "FAS". "FAS" was defined as "randomized study subjects who received at least 1 dose of the study drug." The efficacy analysis included 36 subjects in the ePRO monitoring group, 37 subjects in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 35 subjects in the Usual Care group. Of the assigned study subjects, 1 subject in the Usual Care group (After allocation, treatment was discontinued because adverse events occurred before administration of the study drug.) was excluded from the efficacy analysis. The mean age of the study subjects was 67.7 years in the ePRO monitoring group, 66.2 years in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 68.1 years in the Usual Care group. The percentage of male subjects was 69.4% in the ePRO monitoring group, 81.1% in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 85.7% in the Usual Care group. The proportion of male subjects was high in all groups, but the proportion of female subjects was slightly higher in the ePRO monitoring group than in the other groups. |
|
Of 110 subjects who consented to the study, 1 subject was excluded because it was found that they did not meet the eligibility criteria. The remaining 109 subjects were assigned to 36 subjects in the ePRO monitoring group, 37 subjects in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 36 subjects in the Usual Care group. In addition, 1 subject in the Usual Care group withdrew from the study because he/she discontinued the study before administration of the study drug after assignment.12 subjects in the ePRO monitoring group, 9 subjects in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 15 subjects in the Usual Care group discontinued the study prematurely. |
|
In the safety analysis set, TEAEs occurred in 100.0% of the ePRO monitoring group, 97.3% of the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 100.0% of the Usual Care group. TEAEs of Grade >= 3 occurred in 69.4% of the ePRO monitoring group, 45.9% of the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 42.9% of the Usual Care group. Serious TEAEs occurred in 27.8% of the ePRO monitoring group, 27.0% of the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 40.0% of the Usual Care group. TEAEs leading to discontinuation of the study drug occurred in 11.1% of the ePRO monitoring group, 5.4% of the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 8.6% of the Usual Care group. TEAEs leading to dose adjustment of the study drug (Dose reduction or withdrawal. Does not include discontinuation) occurred in 83.3% of the ePRO monitoring group, 91.9% of the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 88.6% of the Usual Care group. Among all TEAEs that occurred in this study, the SOC with the highest incidence was skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders , which occurred in 66.7% of the ePRO monitoring group (24 subjects), 86.5% of the paper-PRO monitoring group (32 subjects), and 71.4% of the Usual Care group (25 subjects). Gastrointestinal disorders were classified as follows: 69.4% (25 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 64.9% (24 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 57.1% (20 subjects) in the Usual Care group; general and general disorders and administration site conditions were classified as follows: 44.4% (16 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 54.1% (20 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 45.7% (16 subjects) in the Usual Care group; vascular disorders were classified as follows: 58.3% (21 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 45.9% (17 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 37.1% (13 subjects) in the Usual Care group; metabolic and nutritional disorders were classified as follows: 36.1% (13 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 29.7% (11 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 34.3% (12 subjects) in the Usual Care group; nervous system disorders were classified as follows: 36.1% (13 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 40.5% (15 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 22.9% (8 subjects) in the Usual Care group, Respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders were 45.7% (9 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 58.3% (20 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 45.9% (9 subjects) in the Usual Care group; laboratory tests were 37.1% (7 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 36.1% (16 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 69.4% (21 subjects) in the Usual Care group; hepatobiliary disorders were 64.9% (17 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 57.1% (9 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 44.4% (4 subjects) in the Usual Care group; endocrine disorders were 54.1% (8 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 25.0% (9 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 37.8% (6 subjects) in the Usual Care group; and infections and parasitic diseases were 25.7% (5 subjects) in the ePRO monitoring group, 19.4% (2 subjects) in the paper-PRO monitoring group, and 29.7% (8 subjects) in the Usual Care group, In other cases, the incidence was <=69.4%. |
|
The usefulness of ePRO/paper-PRO monitoring could not be clarified in this study. There were no new safety concerns compared with the safety information in the package insert. |
|
This study investigated whether using PRO monitoring to manage adverse events in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib would prevent adverse events from worsening and result in changes in HRQOL. As a result, in comparing the rate of deterioration in the HRQOL index FKSI-19, the superiority of the ePRO group over the Usual Care group and the combined paper-PRO and Usual Care group was not observed. |
|
Dec. 27, 2025 |
Yes |
|
Takeda provides access to the de-identified individual participant data (IPD) for eligible studies to aid qualified researchers in addressing legitimate scientific objectives (Takeda's data sharing commitment is available on https://clinicaltrials.takeda.com/takedas-commitment?commitment=5). These IPDs will be provided in a secure research environment following approval of a data sharing request, and under the terms of a data sharing agreement. |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs011210055 |
Osawa Takahiro |
||
Hokkaido University Hospital |
||
N14W5 Kitaku, Sapporo city, Hokkaido |
||
+81-11-716-1161 |
||
taka0573@gmail.com |
||
Osawa Takahiro |
||
Hokkaido University Hospital |
||
N14W5 Kitaku, Sapporo city, Hokkaido |
||
+81-11-716-1161 |
||
taka0573@gmail.com |
Complete |
Dec. 06, 2021 |
||
| Jan. 18, 2022 | ||
| 105 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1.Patients aged 18 years or older at the time of informed consent (regardless of gender) |
||
1.Patients with treatment-emergent adverse events that have not resolved to baseline or Grade <= 1 according to CTCAE version 5.0. unless clinically insignificant or stable on supportive care. |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Renal cell carcinoma |
||
randomaization |
||
Renal cell carcinoma |
||
Deterioration rate of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) -Kidney Cancer Symptom Index (FKSI -19) during the period until Week 24 or discontinuation |
||
-Changes in FKSI-19 |
||
| Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited | |
| Not applicable |
| Hokkaido University Clinical Research Review Board | |
| N14W5 Kitaku, Sapporo city, Hokkaido, Hokkaido | |
+81-11-706-7934 |
|
| recjimu@huhp.hokudai.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
Nov. 11, 2021 |
none |