|
April. 15, 2020 |
|
|
Sept. 22, 2025 |
|
|
jRCT2080225162 |
A Phase I/II, Multicenter, Open-Label, Nonrandomized Study to Evaluate the Tolerability and Safety of ASTX660 and the Efficacy at the Recommended Dose of ASTX660 in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory T-Cell Lymphoma |
|
A Phase I/II study of ASTX660 in patients with relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma |
|
Nov. 30, 2024 |
|
8 |
|
There were 3 female (37.5%) and 5 male (62.5%) subjects. The mean +- standard deviation age was 69.0 +- 9.8 years, and the mean +- standard deviation weight was 54.74 +- 10.27 kg. There were 7 subjects (87.5%) with an ECOG PS of 0 and 1 subject (12.5%) with an ECOG PS of 1. There were 7 subjects (87.5%) with PTCL and 1 subject (12.5%) with CTCL. Of these subjects, 8 subjects had received chemotherapy for the primary diagnosis, and 1 subject had received radiotherapy. None of them had undergone autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the primary diagnosis. |
|
A total of 13 subjects were screened. Of these, 7 subjects were enrolled in cohort 1, which was to receive 120 mg of ASTX660 and 1 subject was enrolled in cohort 2, which was to receive 150 mg of ASTX660. All 8 subjects discontinued the administration of IMP and terminated their participation in the trial. Reasons for discontinuation of the IMP were progressive disease or disease relapse in 4 subjects, AEs in 2 subjects, and other reason in 1 subject in cohort 1, and progressive disease or disease relapse in 1 subject in cohort 2. Reasons for discontinuation of the trial were death in 4 subjects and other reasons in 3 subjects in cohort 1, and other reasons in 1 subject in cohort 2. |
|
-The most common Treatment-emergent adverse events(TEAEs) included lymphopenia, amylase increased, lipase increased, and conjunctivitis. -No TEAEs leading to death or serious TEAEs were reported. -Treatment-emergent adverse events that led to the discontinuation of the IMP were reported in 2 subjects at 120 mg/day; these TEAEs were related to the IMP. -Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported in 4 subjects at 120 mg/day. No Grade 3 or higher TEAEs were reported at 150 mg/day. |
|
Safety Results: -Dose-limiting toxicity reported in this trial included Grade 3 amylase increased in 1 subject at 120 mg/day. -ASTX660 administered orally in an intermittent (7 days on/7 days off) dosing regimen demonstrated a manageable safety profile and was tolerated at 120 mg/day. |
|
Efficacy Results: -In cohort 1, 1 subject was assessed to be a responder and the Duration of response (DOR), Progression free survival (PFS), and Time to response (TTR) for the subject with PTCL, whose best overall response was partial response (PR), were 3 days, 33 days, and 31 days, respectively. -In cohort 1, 1 subject with PTCL had the longest PFS of 1184 days, with best overall response of stable disease. -There are limitations in explaining the efficacy of ASTX660 from the results obtained. Pharmacokinetic: The PK results following single and once daily oral administration of ASTX660 for cohort 1 (120 mg/day) and cohort 2 (150 mg/day) were as follows. The results in cohort 2 (150 mg) are based on the data from 1 subject; -On Cycle 1 Day 1, following single oral administration of ASTX660 at doses of 120 mg and 150 mg, the mean Cmax, AUC24h, and AUCt of ASTX660 all increased in a dose-dependent manner. -On Cycle 1 Day 1, the median tmax for 120 mg and 150 mg was 0.98 hours and 0.48 hours, respectively. -On Cycle 1 Day 7, the median tmax for 120 mg was 0.94 hours. -On Cycle 1 Day 7, the mean t1/2,z for 120 mg was 35.3 hours. -The mean accumulation ratios of Cycle 1 Day 7 to Cycle 1 Day 1 for Cmax, AUC24h, and Ctrough were 1.56, 1.88, and 2.96 for 120 mg, respectively. |
|
-ASTX660 was generally tolerated at 120 mg/day in an intermittent (7 days on/7 days off) dosing regimens in Japanese subjects with r/r PTCL or r/r CTCL. -Dose-limiting toxicity reported in this trial included Grade 3 amylase increased in 1 subject at 120 mg/day. -No TEAEs leading to death or serious TEAEs were reported. -No significant safety concerns were identified in this trial, but the RD for the phase 2 part was not determined because the sponsor prematurely terminated the trial. |
|
Sept. 25, 2025 |
|
No |
|
Small studies with less than 25 participants are excluded from data sharing. |
|
| version:4.0 date:Dec. 05, 2022 |
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. |
||
2-16-4, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan |
||
+81-3-6717-1400 |
||
CL_OPCJ_RDA_Team@otsuka.jp |
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. |
||
2-16-4, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan |
||
+81-3-6361-7314 |
||
opc_ctr@otsuka.jp |
completed |
May. 01, 2020 |
||
| 61 | ||
Interventional |
||
multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, phase 1/2 trial |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1-2 |
||
1) Patients with T-cell lymphoma with histological diagnosis based on WHO classification (2017) |
||
1) Patients with active infection requiring treatment with antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma(r/r PTCL), |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
safety |
||
safety |
||
| Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., LTD. | |
| - |
| - | |
| - |
| the Institutional Review Board of Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine | |
| 2-2-2 Iidanishi, Yamagata-shi, Yamagata 990-9585, Japan | |
| approved | |
April. 06, 2020 |
| NCT04362007 | |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
| JapicCTI-205258 | |
| Japan |