|
July. 16, 2019 |
|
|
June. 07, 2024 |
|
|
jRCT2080224782 |
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis |
|
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bimekizumab in Subjects With Active Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis |
|
July. 08, 2022 |
|
254 |
|
The mean age of all study participants was 39.4 years (range of 18 to 76 years). Overall, there was a higher proportion of male study participants than female study participants (54.3% vs 45.7%, respectively). The majority of study participants were White (86.2%). The mean body weight and mean BMI overall were 80.91kg and 27.42kg/m2, respectively. For each treatment group, the number of study participants in the MRI+/CRP- stratification level was slightly higher (41.7%) compared with MRI+/CRP+ (31.9%) and MRI-/CRP+ (26.4%) stratification levels. Study participants were most commonly enrolled in the following countries: Poland (28.0%), the Czech Republic (20.9%), Spain (10.2%), Germany (9.4%), and the United States (7.1%). Overall, the mean times since first diagnosis and first symptoms of axSpA were 3.60 years (range: 0.1 to 31.3 years) and 9.02 years (range: 0.4 to 45.1 years), respectively. The majority of all study participants (77.6%) were positive for HLA-B27, a genetic marker associated with axSpA. Treatment groups were generally well balanced with respect to nr-axSpA-related and other Baseline disease characteristics. Prior anti-TNF therapy was used by 10.6% of all study participants. At Baseline, the majority of all study participants were using NSAID therapies (74.8%), 24.0% were on csDMARDs (8.3% on MTX, 13.0% on SSZ), 8.3% were taking oral corticosteroids, and 16.5% were on analgesic/opioid therapies. Baseline efficacy characteristics were well balanced across treatment groups, consistent with the study's inclusion criteria, and reflective of the active disease at enrollment in the study: BASDAI >=4 and BASDAI spinal pain >=4 (question 2). Overall, the mean BASDAI total score was 6.80 (range: 4.1 to 9.6), the mean BASDAI spinal pain score was 7.5 (range: 4 to 10), the mean PGADA was 7.0 (range: 0 to 10), and the mean total spinal pain NRS score was 7.2 (range: 2 to 10). The mean BASFI score was 5.43 (range: 0.0 to 9.1). The geometric mean hs-CRP was 4.806mg/L (range: 0.05 to 79.06mg/L). Most study participants had an ASDAS-CRP status of vHD activity (58.3%) or HD activity (40.2%), and the mean ASDAS-CRP was 3.7133 (range: 1.959 to 5.513). |
|
A total of 254 study participants were randomized and started the Double-Blind Treatment Period as follows: 128 study participants in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 126 study participants in the placebo group. The percentages of study participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period were similar in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group (98.4%) and the placebo group (93.7%). The frequency of study discontinuation was low in the All study participants group (10 study participants [3.9%]) and in each of the treatment groups in the Double-Blind Treatment Period (1.6% and 6.3% in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W and the placebo groups, respectively). The most common primary reasons for discontinuation during the Double-Blind Treatment Period were due to withdrawal by study participant (4 study participants [1.6%]) and an AE (4 study participants [1.6%]). In the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group, no study participants discontinued due to withdrawal by study participant, and 4 study participants (3.2%) discontinued due to withdrawal by study participant in the placebo group. In the Bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group, 1 study participant (0.8%) discontinued due to an AE, and 3 study participants (2.4%) in the placebo group discontinued due to an AE. A total of 242 study participants entered the Maintenance Period as follows: 126 study participants in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 116 study participants in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group. Of the 244 study participants who completed the Double-Blind Treatment Period, 2 study participants in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group discontinued the study at Week 16 and did not enter the Maintenance Period; the reason for discontinuation was due to an AE (2 study participants [1.6%]). No study participants in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group discontinued between the Double-Blind Treatment Period and the Maintenance Period. A total of 220 study participants (86.6%) completed the 36-week Maintenance Period, 22 study participants (8.7%) discontinued the study during the Maintenance Period, and 51 study participants (20.1%) entered and completed the SFU Period . The percentages of study participants who completed the Maintenance Period were 87.5% in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 85.7% in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group. The most common reasons for discontinuation during the Maintenance Period were withdrawal by study participant (12 study participants [4.7%]), due to an AE (5 study participants [2.0%]), and due to lack of efficacy (4 study participants [1.6%]) . In the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group, 8 study participants (6.3%) discontinued due to withdrawal by study participant and 4 study participants (3.2%) in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group discontinued due to withdrawal by study participant. Three study participants (2.3%) in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 2 study participants (1.6%) in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group discontinued due to an AE. Two study participants (1.6%) in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 2 study participants (1.6%) in the placebo/bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group discontinued due to lack of efficacy. Within the participants who completed the maintence treatment period, 203 study participants (79.9%) had entered the OLE study (AS0014). |
|
During the Double-Blind Treatment Period, TEAEs were reported at a slightly higher incidence in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group (80 study participants [62.5%]) compared with the placebo group (71 study participants [56.3%]) . There were no serious TEAEs in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and only 1 serious TEAE reported by 1 participant (0.8%) in the placebo group. The incidence of safety topics of interest TEAEs was higher in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group (18 study participants [14.1%]) compared with the placebo group (8 study participants [6.3%]). Very few participants discontinued due to TEAEs: 2 study participants (1.6%) discontinued due to TEAEs in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 5 study participants (4.0%) discontinued due to TEAEs in the placebo group. Drug-related TEAEs (as determined by the Investigator) were reported at a higher incidence in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group (33 study participants [25.8%]) compared with the placebo group (17 study participants [13.5%]). There were no severe TEAEs in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and only 1 severe TEAE reported by 1 participant (0.8%) in the placebo group. No deaths due to AEs or TEAEs were reported during the Double-Blind Treatment Period. During the Overall Period, 183 study participants (75.0%) reported a TEAE; when the TEAE incidence was adjusted for duration of exposure, the resulting EAIR was 202.27/100 participant-years. Nine study participants (3.7%) reported a serious TEAE. Seventy-five study participants (30.7%) reported a safety topics of interest TEAE. Six study participants (2.5%) reported a TEAE that led to discontinuation and 8 study participants (3.3%) permanently withdrew from IMP due to TEAEs. Drug-related TEAEs (as determined by the Investigator) were reported by 81 study participants (33.2%). Eight study participants (3.3%) reported a severe TEAE. No deaths due to AEs or TEAEs were reported during the Overall Period. Treatment-emergent AEs were the most frequently reported in the SOC of Infections and infestations in both treatment groups with higher incidence in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group (35.9%) compared with the placebo group (24.6%) . Treatment-emergent AEs in the next most common SOCs were Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (16 study participants [12.5%] in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 7 study participants (5.6%) in the placebo group) and Gastrointestinal disorders (12 study participants [9.4%] in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group and 16 study participants (12.7%) in the placebo group). The most commonly reported TEAEs, by PT (>=3%), in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group were nasopharyngitis (10.2%), upper respiratory tract infection (7.0%), pharyngitis (3.1%), and oral candidiasis (3.1%). The most commonly reported TEAEs, by PT (>=3%), in the placebo group were upper respiratory tract infection (7.9%), nasopharyngitis (4.8%), and uveitis (3.2%). Treatment-emergent AEs were most frequently reported in the SOCs of Infections and infestations (52.0%) and Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders (18.0%). Treatment-emergent AEs in the next most common SOCs were Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (15.6%), and Gastrointestinal disorders (13.9%). Overall, the most commonly reported TEAEs, by PT (>=3%), were nasopharyngitis (12.3%), upper respiratory tract infection (9.4%), and oral candidiasis (7.4% ). |
|
The bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group had a higher ASAS40 response rate compared with the placebo group at Week 16 that was statistically significant and clinically meaningful (47.7% vs 21.4%, respectively; p<0.001). |
|
There was a greater least-squares (LS) mean decrease from Baseline in BASDAI total score in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group compared with the placebo group (-3.07 vs -1.55, respectively; p<0.001). The ASAS20 response rate was higher in the bimekizumab 160mg Q4W group compared with the placebo group (68.8% vs 38.1%, respectively; p<0.001). |
|
254 patients with nr-axSpA were randomized. At week 16, primary and all ranked secondary endpoints were met in this trial. Dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab resulted in significant and rapid improvements in efficacy outcomes vs placebo and was well tolerated in patients with nr-axSpA. |
|
June. 07, 2024 |
|
Jan. 17, 2023 |
|
https://ard.bmj.com/content/82/4/515.abstract |
Yes |
|
Data from this study may be requested by qualified researchers six months after product approval in the US and/or Europe, or global development is discontinued, and 18 months after trial completion. Investigators may request access to anonymized IPD and redacted study documents which may include: raw datasets, analysis-ready datasets, study protocol, blank case report form, annotated case report form, statistical analysis plan, dataset specifications, and clinical study report. Prior to use of the data, proposals need to be approved by an independent review panel at www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com and a signed data sharing agreement will need to be executed. All documents are available in English only, for a pre-specified time, typically 12 months, on a password protected portal. This plan may change if a determination is made that the data cannot be adequately anonymized. |
|
| version: date: |
UCB Japan Co., Ltd. |
||
8-17-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-3-6864-7500 |
||
CTR-JRCT.UCBJapan@ucb.com |
UCB Japan Co., Ltd. |
||
8-17-1 Nishi-shinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-3-6864-7587 |
||
CTR_SCC_UCBJapan@UCB.com |
completed |
Sept. 30, 2019 |
||
| 15 | ||
Interventional |
||
Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
3 |
||
-Male or female patients at least 18 years of age. |
||
- Treatment with more than 1 TNF-alpha inhibitor and/or more than 2 additional non-TNF-alpha biological response modifiers, or any interleukin (IL)-17 biological response modifier |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Nonradiographic Axial Spondyloarthritis |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
efficacy |
||
safety |
||
| UCB Japan Co., Ltd. | |
| - |
| - | |
| - |
| Hokkaido University Hospital Institutional Review Board | |
| Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8648, Japan | |
+81-11-706-7061 |
|
| - | |
| approved | |
June. 11, 2019 |
| NCT03928704 | |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
| JapicCTI-194861 | |
| Japan/Asia except Japan/North America/Europe |