|
Nov. 05, 2018 |
|
|
Sept. 14, 2022 |
|
|
jRCT2080224130 |
An Open-label, Crossover Study to Compare Different Formulations and to Evaluate Effect of Food on Pharmacokinetics of TAS-116 in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors |
|
A phase I study of Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
|
June. 25, 2021 |
|
30 |
|
In Cohort 1 [Pharmacokinetic (PK) study of different formulations], the median (range) age was 64.0 (38-74) years, 61.5% of patients were male, and 61.5% had an ECOG PS of 0. In Cohort 2 (food-effect study), the median (range) age was 59.0 (40-78) years, 52.9% were male, and 35.3% had an ECOG PS of 0. The most common tumor types were lung cancer (33.3%), followed by pancreatic cancer (26.7%) and rectum (13.3%) and biliary tract (6.7%) cancers. |
|
In Cohort 1, 13 patients received the study drug Formulations A and B, and 12 patients were included in the PK evaluable population. In Cohort 2, 17 patients received Formulation A under fasting and fed conditions, and 16 patients were included in the PK evaluable population. All patients (n = 30) treated in the PK evaluation period proceeded to the consecutive administration period. |
|
In the consecutive administration period, 83.3% (25/30) of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and 33.3% (10/30) had Grade 3 or higher TRAEs. TRAEs with an incidence of >=15% included diarrhea (53.3%), decreased appetite (23.3%), nausea (20.0%), and malaise (16.7%). Grade 3 or higher TRAEs with an incidence of >=10% were anemia (13.3%) and diarrhea (10.0%). No TRAEs led to death or treatment discontinuation. |
|
In Cohort 1, maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC)last, and AUCinf geometric mean ratios for Formulations A and B (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.8078 (0.6569-0.9933), 0.7973 (0.6672-0.9529), and 0.8094 (0.6697-0.9782), respectively; 90% CIs were not within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). In Cohort 2, mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were higher in fed vs fasting conditions. |
|
Overall response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 0%, 33%, and 1.5 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease >=5 months. |
|
Bioequivalence of the two formulations was unconfirmed. Systemic exposure of Formulation A was approximately 20% less than Formulation B. A high-fat/calorie meal increased the relative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single 160-mg dose. |
|
Aug. 06, 2022 |
|
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10637-022-01285-9 |
No |
|
Data will not be shared according to the Sponsor policy on data sharing. Taiho policy on data sharing may be found at https://www.taiho.co.jp/en/science/policy/clinical_trial_information_disclosure_policy/index.html. |
|
| version: date: |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
toiawaseCD1@taiho.co.jp |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
toiawase@taiho.co.jp |
completed |
Jan. 15, 2019 |
||
| 24 | ||
Interventional |
||
Open-label, two-cohort, respective two-arms, randomized phase I study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1 |
||
Key inclusion criteria |
||
Key exclusion criteria |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Solid tumor |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
pharmacokinetics |
||
safety |
||
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
| - |
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
| Clinical Trial of Taiho |
| Hokkaido University Hospital IRB | |
| Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido | |
+81-11-706-7061 |
|
| tiken@med.hokudai.ac.jp | |
| approved | |
Nov. 20, 2018 |
| JapicCTI-184191 | |
| Japan |