|
Jan. 11, 2018 |
|
|
Oct. 03, 2025 |
|
|
jRCT2080223768 |
Phase I/II Clinical Study of TAS0313 in Patients with Solid Tumor |
|
TAS0313 Phase I/II study |
|
Feb. 14, 2025 |
|
73 |
|
Cohort A (Dose-Escalation): In the 9mg and 27mg groups, 3/10 and 5/7 patients were male, respectively. The median age in both groups was 65 years, and ECOG performance status of 0 was observed in 5/10 and 3/7 patients. In the 9mg group, tumor types included pancreatic cancer (n=3), biliary tract cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer (n=1 each), and others (n=3). In the 27mg group, tumor types included biliary tract cancer, lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer (n=1 each), and others (n=4). Cohort B (Efficacy Exploration): 5/10 patients were male, with a median age of 56.5 years. Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) was 80 in 5 patients and 90 in 4 patients. Histological subtypes included glioblastoma (n=8) and gliosarcoma (n=2). Cohort C1 (Urothelial Carcinoma, Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Naive): 31/36 patients were male, with a median age of 71.0 years. ECOG performance status of 0 was observed in 28 patients. Histological subtypes included bladder cancer (n=16), renal pelvic cancer (n=14), and ureteral cancer (n=6). Cohort C2 (Urothelial Carcinoma, Prior Pembrolizumab Treatment): 6/10 patients were male, with a median age of 65.5 years. |
|
Cohort A: A total of 10 and 7 patients were enrolled in the 9mg and 27mg groups, respectively. The number of patients who received the investigational drug, and were included in the full analysis set (FAS), and the pharmacodynamics evaluable set was 10 and 7, respectively. The number of patients included the tolerability evaluable set was 8 and 6, respectively. Cohort B: Ten patients were enrolled. All received the investigational drug and were included in FAS, while 9 were included in the per-protocol set (PPS). Cohort C1: Thirty-six patients were enrolled. All received the investigational drug and were included in FAS. Cohort C2: Ten patients were enrolled. All received the investigational drug and were included in FAS. |
|
Cohort A: Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) observed in >=2 patients included injection-site reactions in 60.0% of patients in the 9 mg group and 57.1% in the 27 mg group, and pyrexia in 28.6% of patients in the 27 mg group. No grade >=3 ADRs were reported. Cohort B: ADRs observed in >=2 patients included injection-site reactions (80.0%), pyrexia (70.0%), malaise, injection-site erythema, and injection-site pruritus (each 20.0%). Grade >=3 ADRs included anaphylactoid reaction in 10.0% of patients, and this event resolved immediately without any symptoms of shock and necessitated treatment discontinuation. Cohort C1: The ADRs observed in >=10% of patients were pyrexia and injection site reactions (each 41.7%) followed by injection site induration and malaise (each 16.7%). No grade >=3 ADRs were observed in >=10% of patients. Cohort C2: The most common ADRs were injection site reactions and pyrexia. No grade >=3 ADRs were observed in >=10% of patients. |
|
Cohort A: No ADRs meeting the criteria for tolerability evaluation were observed in either the 9 mg or 27 mg groups. Cohort B: The objective response rate (ORR) was 22.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.5%-55.6%) in the PPS as assessed by RANO. Cohort C1: The ORR was 33.3% (95% CI: 18.6%-51.0%) including CR in 7 (19.4%) patients and PR in 5 (13.9%) in the FAS, as assessed by RECIST. Cohort C2: The ORR was 0% (95% CI: 0%-30.8%) in the FAS, as assessed by RECIST. |
|
Cohort A: In the 9mg and 27mg groups, the disease control rate (DCR) was 20.0% and 28.6%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months and 2.2 months, respectively. Cohort B: The DCR was 44.4% (95% CI: 13.7%-78.8%), the median duration of response (DOR) was 33.1 months, and the median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI: 1.3-49.5) in the PPS. Cohort C1: The DCR was 66.7% (95% CI: 49.0%-81.4%), the median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 2.4-14.2), and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached (FAS, RECIST*). Among patients with high TIL or CPS (TIL >=99 or CPS >=50%) and those with low TIL and CPS (TIL <99 and CPS <50%), the median PFS was 26.4 months and 3.7 months, respectively. Cohort C2: The DCR was 50.0% (95% CI: 18.7%-81.3%) (FAS, RECIST). |
|
In Cohort A, no ADRs meeting the criteria for tolerability evaluation were observed in either the TAS0313 9mg or 27mg groups. In Cohort B, the monotherapy of TAS0313 at 27mg showed efficacy and acceptable safety in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. In Cohort C, the combination therapy of TAS0313 9mg and pembrolizumab showed efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had no prior treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors and the main ADRs were manageable. |
|
April. 02, 2024 |
|
https://aacrjournals.org/mct/article/23/4/532/741862/TAS0313-plus-Pembrolizumab-for-Post-Chemotherapy |
No |
|
Data will not be shared according to the Sponsor policy on data sharing. Taiho policy on data sharing may be found at https://www.taiho.co.jp/en/science/policy/clinical_trial_information_disclosure_policy/index.html. |
|
| version:Ver.P13 date:Nov. 06, 2023 |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
+81-3-3293-2455 |
||
toiawaseCD1@taiho.co.jp |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
+81-3-3293-2455 |
||
toiawase@taiho.co.jp |
completed |
Jan. 30, 2018 |
||
| 130 | ||
Interventional |
||
open-label, non-randomized, multicenter Phase I/II study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1-2 |
||
1. Provided written informed consent for participate in clinical trial |
||
1. Has serious diseases or conditions |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Solid tumor (urothelial carcinoma, and so on) |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
safety |
||
pharmacodynamics |
||
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
| - |
| National Cancer Ctr IRB #2 - J | |
| 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo | |
- |
|
| - | |
| approved | |
Oct. 31, 2018 |
| JapicCTI-183824 | |
| Japan |