|
Nov. 25, 2016 |
|
|
Sept. 15, 2021 |
|
|
jRCT2080223392 |
A Phase 2 Study of E6011 in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding to Biologics |
|
A Phase 2 Study of E6011 in Subjects With Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding to Biologics |
|
July. 01, 2020 |
|
66 |
|
Overall, in the Core Treatmemnt Phase (Weeks 0-12), mean (SD) age was 51.5 (11.05) years. The majority of subjects were female (50/64 subjects, 78.1%). Overall, the mean (SD) RA duration was 9.2 (6.26) years. A total of 65.6% of subjects received 1 prior biologic with inadequate response and 34.4% of subjects received 2 prior biologics. The majority of prior biologics was anti-TNF (67.2%, 43/64 subjects). The mean (SD) dose of MTX was 9.4 (2.86) mg/week. |
|
In the Treatmemnt Phase, a total of 66 subjects were randomized into the study. After randomization, 2 of 66 subjects discontinued the study before starting study drug treatment. A total of 64 subjects (33 in the placebo group and 31 in the E6011 group) received at least 1 dose of study drug (E6011 400 mg or placebo). Of the 64 subjects, 55 subjects (29 in the placebo group, 26 in the 400 mg group) completed the planned treatment regimen and 9 discontinued study treatment prematurely during the Core Treatment Phase (Weeks 0-12). All of the treated subjects (64 subjects) were included in the FAS and Safety Analysis Set. Fifty-five subjects were re-randomized at Week 12 and treated with E6011 200 mg or 400 mg (15 subjects for placebo/200 mg, 14 subjects for placebo/400 mg, 14 subjects for 400/200 mg, 12 subjects for 400/400 mg). Of the 55 subjects re-randomized, 48 completed the planned treatment regimen and 7 discontinued study treatment prematurely between Week 12 and Week 24. In the Extension Phase, a total of 47 subjects completed the Treatment Phase and were rolled over in the Extension Phase. Of the 47 subjects, 21 subjects completed the Extension Phase and 26 subjects discontinued study treatment prematurely during the Extension Phase. All of the subjects who were rolled over in the Extension Phase (47 subjects) were included in the FAS and the Safety Analysis Set. |
|
During the Core Treatment Phase, the incidence of TEAEs was 57.6% (19/33 subjects) in the placebo group and 45.2% (14/31 subjects) in the E6011 group. The incidence of treatment-related TEAEs was 27.3% (9/33 subjects) in the placebo group and 25.8% (8/31 subjects) in the E6011 group. TEAEs that occurred in at least 2 subjects in the E6011 group were stomatitis, injection site erythema, nasopharyngitis, and blood creatine phosphokinase increased. Among those TEAEs, stomatitis (0% in the placebo group, 6.5% in the E6011 group), injection site erythema (0% in the placebo group, 6.5% in the E6011 group), blood creatine phosphokinase increased (0% in the placebo group, 6.5% in the E6011 group) occurred more frequently in the E6011 group than the placebo group. During the Entire Treatment Phase, the incidence of TEAEs was 80.0% (12/15 subjects) in the placebo/200 mg group, 92.9% (13/14 subjects) in the placebo/400 mg group, 92.9% (13/14 subjects) in the 400/200 mg group and 75.0% (9/12 subjects) in the 400/400 mg group. The incidence of treatment-related TEAEs was 46.7% (7/15 subjects) in the placebo/200 mg group, 42.9% (6/14 subjects) in the placebo/400 mg group, 42.9% (6/14 subjects) in the 400/200 mg group, and 33.3% (4/12 subjects) in the 400/400 mg group. TEAEs that occurred in at least 2 subjects in the 400/200 mg group or 400/400 mg group were injection site erythema and nasopharyngitis. Two of 14 subjects (14.3%) experienced injection site erythema in the 400/200 mg group while no subjects experienced it in the 400/400 mg group. The incidence of nasopharyngitis was similar between the 400/200 mg group and 400/400 mg group (28.6% in the 400/200 mg group, 33.3% in the 400/400 mg group). In the Extension Phase, TEAEs that occurred in at least 10% of subjects in the overall population were nasopharyngitis (51.1%, 24/47 subjects), and gastroenteritis, rash, back pain, anaemia, and hepatic function abnormal (10.6% each, 5/47 subjects). |
|
ACR20 response rate at Week 12 was 27.3% (9/33 subjects) in the placebo group and 22.6% (7/31 subjects) in the E6011 group. No statistically significant differences were found between the placebo group and the E6011 group (P=0.621; a logistic regression model). |
|
ACR50 response rate at Week 12 was 3.0% in the placebo group and 9.7% in the E6011 group. ACR70 response rate at Week 12 was 0.0% in the placebo group and 3.2% in the E6011 group. No statistically significant differences were found in ACR50 and ACR70 between the placebo and E6011 groups (P=0.131 and P=0.479, respectively; a logistic regression model). In the Extension Phase, ACR20 response rate at Weeks 52 and 72 was 38.5% and 38.5% in the placebo/200 mg group, 45.5% and 45.5% in the placebo/400 mg group, 53.8% and 53.8% in the 400/200 mg group, and 50.0% and 20.0% in the 400/400 mg group, respectively. ACR50 response rate at Weeks 52 and 72 was 15.4% and 15.4% in the placebo/200 mg group, 27.3% and 27.3% in the placebo/400 mg group, 30.8% and 30.8% in the 400/200 mg group, and 10.0% and 10.0% in the 400/400 mg group, respectively. ACR70 response rate at Weeks 52 and 72 was 0% and 0% in the placebo/200 mg group, 18.2% and 9.1% in the placebo/400 mg group, 15.4% and 15.4% in the 400/200 mg group, and 10.0% and 10.0% in the 400/400 mg group, respectively. |
|
E6011 400 mg did not show clear efficacy in ACR20 response rate at Week 12 compared with placebo in Japanese RA subjects with inadequately responding to biologics. E6011 was well tolerated with no notable safety concerns at doses of 200 to 400 mg when administered subcutaneously every 2 weeks for up to 102 weeks. |
|
Yes |
|
https://www.eisai.com/company/business/research/clinical/index.html |
|
| version: date: |
Eisai Co., Ltd. |
||
eisai-chiken_hotline@hhc.eisai.co.jp |
Eisai Co., Ltd. |
||
eisai-chiken_hotline@hhc.eisai.co.jp |
completed |
Nov. 26, 2016 |
||
| 60 | ||
Interventional |
||
This study is a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group comparison study in rheumatoid arthritis participants inadequately responding to biologics. |
||
treatment purpose |
||
2 |
||
(1)Diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) under the 1987 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) or 2010 ACR/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria >=12 weeks before informed consent |
||
(1)Any history or complication of inflammatory arthritic disorder other than RA or Sjogren's syndrome |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| 75age old under | ||
Both |
||
Rheumatoid Arthritis Inadequately Responding to Biologics |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
safety |
||
efficacy |
||
| Eisai Co., Ltd. | |
| - |
| - | |
| - |
| - | |
| - | |
| approved | |
Oct. 03, 2016 |
| NCT02960490 | |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
| JapicCTI-163447 | |
| Japan |