|
June. 26, 2013 |
|
|
Aug. 13, 2019 |
|
|
jRCT2080222126 |
A RANDOMIZED PHASE III STUDY OF TAS-118 VERSUS S-1 IN PATIENTS WITH GEMCITABINE-REFRACTORY ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER |
|
GRAPE |
|
April. 28, 2017 |
|
603 |
|
The median age was 65.0 years (range, 30-79) in the TAS-118 arm and 64.0 years (range, 32-79) in the S-1 arm. The median BSA was 1.590 (range, 1.16-2.11) in the TAS-118 arm and 1.580 (range, 1.15-1.93) in the S-1 arm. |
|
Between July 2013 and August 2015, 603 patients were randomised to TAS-118 (n= 301) or S-1 (n= 302), and 296 patients in the TAS-118 group and 290 in the S-1 group were included in the full analysis set. |
|
Any AEs were reported in 300 patients (100.0%) in the TAS-118 arm and 293 patients (97.3%) in the S-1 arm. SAEs were reported 137 patients (45.7%), 220 events in the TAS-118 arm and 123 patients (40.9%), 206 events in the S-1 arm. The most common AEs in the TAS-118 group were decreased appetite (58.0%), stomatitis (50.3%) and diarrhea (48.7%), and those in the S-1 group were decreased appetite (54.8%), diarrhoea (42.5%) and nausea (40.5%). The numbers of patients who discontinued the study treatment due to AEs were 26 (8.7%) and 29 (9.6%) in the TAS-118 and S-1 groups, respectively. Dose reduction due to AEs was reported in 108 (36.0%) and 45 (15.0%) patients from the TAS-118 and S-1 groups, respectively. AEs leading to death were observed in 16 (5.3%) and 12 (4.0%) patients from the TAS-118 and S-1 groups, respectively; only one event (hepatic dysfunction) in the TAS-118 group was judged to be treatment related. |
|
The median OS was 7.6 months (95% CI, 7.0-8.2) in the TAS-118 arm and 7.9 months (95% CI, 7.0-8.4) in the S-1 arm (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.82-1.16]; stratified logrank test, p=0.756). No significant differences were found between the two arms. |
|
PFS was significantly longer in the TAS-118 arm than the S-1 arm; 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.2) in the TAS-118 arm and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.7-2.9) in the S-1 arm (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.67-0.95]; p=0.009). TTF was statistically significantly longer in the TAS-118 arm than the S-1 arm; 3.0 months (95% CI, 2.8-4.0) in the TAS-118 arm and 2.8 months (95% CI, 2.5-2.8) in the S-1 arm (HR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.68-0.95]; p=0.009). Overall, there were no significant differences in ORR or DCR between the two arms; ORR was 20.6% (95% CI, 15.7-26.1) in the TAS-118 arm and 15.1% (95% CI, 10.8-20.3) in the S-1 arm (p=0.127), and DCR was 67.2% (95% CI, 61.0-72.9) in the TAS-118 arm and 59.2% (95% CI, 52.7-65.5) in the S-1 arm (p=0.075). DR was similar in the two arms; 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.0-5.5) in the TAS-118 arm and 4.7 months (95% CI, 4.2-5.6) in the S-1 arm (HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.61-1.59]; p=0.992). |
|
TAS-118 did not improve OS in patients with gemcitabine-refractory advanced pancreatic cancer compared to S-1. PFS and TTF were statistically significantly improved by TAS-118 compared with S-1. Incidence, profile and severity of adverse events were similar between groups. |
|
Nov. 22, 2018 |
|
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959804918314321?via%3Dihub |
Undecided |
|
https://www.clinicaltrials.jp/file/MVWZTkpWc |
|
| version:2 date:Sept. 09, 2013 |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
- |
||
toiawaseCD1@taiho.co.jp |
Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. |
||
- |
||
- |
||
toiawase@taiho.co.jp |
completed |
July. 12, 2013 |
||
| 600 | ||
Interventional |
||
A randomised, open-label study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
3 |
||
-Invasive pancreatic ductal carcinoma. |
||
-Unmanageable Diarrhea. |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 79age old under | ||
Both |
||
pancreatic cancer |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
efficacy |
||
safety |
||
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
| - |
| Taiho Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | |
| Clinical Trial of Taiho |
| National Cancer Ctr IRB #2 - J | |
| 5-1-1, Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo | |
- |
|
| - | |
| approved | |
July. 31, 2013 |
| JapicCTI-132172 | |
| Japan/Asia except Japan |