|
Jan. 19, 2022 |
|
|
Dec. 09, 2024 |
|
|
jRCT2041210130 |
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multiple Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of VIS649 in Participants with Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Nephropathy (VIS649-201) |
|
Phase 2 Study of VIS649 for IgA Nephropathy (VIS649-201) |
|
June. 18, 2023 |
|
155 |
|
155 participants were enrolled in the trial, randomized to trial intervention, and received at least one dose of trial intervention. Participants were randomized to each trial intervention as follows: 2 mg/kg Sibeprenlimab: 38 subjects 4 mg/kg Sibeprenlimab: 41 subjects 8 mg/kg Sibeprenlimab: 38 subjects Placebo: 38 subjects Overall, the participants were predominantly Asian (115 of 155 participants [74.2%]). Of the participants enrolled in the study, 88 of 155 participants (56.8%) were male and 67 of 155 participants (43.2%) were female. The mean age overall was 40.7 years, and the mean age ranged from 18 to 73 years. The mean BMI overall was 27.56 kg/m2 and the mean BMI ranged from 16.3 to 48.3 kg/m2. Fifteen participants were enrolled in Japan (12.3 %); the other regional parameter was 'Rest of World' which enrolled 136 (87.7%) participants. Almost all participants were on ACEI or ARB therapy with 37 (97.4%), 40 (97.6%), 37 (97.4%) and 38 (100%) for the 2, 4, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups respectively at baseline. Use of SGLT2i at baseline was much lower with a range of 1 to 3 participants (2.6% to 4.9%) use at baseline. Baseline 24-hour uPCR geometric mean was 1.46, 1.53, 1.44 1.68 for the 2, 4, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups, respectively. The number of participants with a baseline uPCR <= 2 g/g was 27, 27, 27 and 25 across the 2, 4, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups respectively; baseline uPCR >2 g/g was 10, 13, 8, 11 participants in the 2, 4, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups, respectively. Baseline median eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) for the groups was 58.0, 64.0, 56.0 and 68.5 for the 2, 4, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups, respectively. |
|
The VIS649-201 study was a placebo-controlled, randomized study which assigned participants to the 2 mg/kg, 4 mg/kg, 8 mg/kg and placebo groups in a 1:1:1:1 scheme. A total of 323 participants were screened for this trial and 155 participants were enrolled. Of the 155 participants enrolled and started the study and 146 completed the study. For the VIS649 2 mg/kg group, 38 participants started the study and 35 completed. Reasons for withdrawal were adverse event (1 participant) and withdrawal by subject for 2 participants. In the VIS649 4 mg/kg group, 41 participants started the study and 39 participants completed it. Reasons for withdrawal were protocol violation (1 participant) and withdrawal by subject (1 participant). In the VIS649 8 mg/kg group, 38 participants started the study and 37 participants completed. One participant did not complete (withdrawal by subject). In the placebo group, 38 participants started the study and 35 participants completed it. Reasons for discontinuation in placebo were physician decision (1 participant) and withdrawal by subject (2 participants). Of the 155 participants enrolled and randomized 146 participants (94.2%) completed the planned treatment, 9 participants (5.8%) discontinued treatment early, and 7 participants (4.5%) discontinued the trial early. |
|
The monthly IV administration of 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg sibeprenlimab to participants with IgAN resulted in no significant or known safety concerns. Overall, 119 of 155 participants (76.8%) reported at least 1 TEAE during the trial. the incidence of TEAEs was similar across the sibeprenlimab dose groups (73.7% [2 mg/kg], 80.5% [4 mg/kg], and 81.6% [8 mg/kg] and the placebo group (71.1%). Serious adverse events were reported for 7 of 155 participants (4.5%) during this trial, including the death of 1 (placebo) of the 155 participants (0.6%) None of these events were considered by the investigator to be treatment related. The most commonly reported TEAE was COVID-19 (51 of 155 participants [32.9%]); however, a total of 56 of 155 participants (36.1%) had COVID infection (including events of COVID-19, Coronavirus infection, Coronavirus test positive, and SARS-COV-2 test positive) reported as a TEAE during the trial. The total number of participants with COVID infection was higher in the placebo group (17 of 38 participants [44.7%] compared with the pooled sibeprenlimab treatment group (39 of 117 participants [33.3%]). Treatment-emergent AEs considered by the investigator to be related to the trial intervention were reported for 23 of 155 participants (14.8%). The incidence of treatment-related TEAEs was also similar across the sibeprenlimab dose groups (18.4% [2 mg/kg], 17.1% [4 mg/kg], and 10.5% [8 mg/kg]) and the placebo group (13.2%). The most commonly reported treatment-related TEAE was headache (3 of 155 participants [1.9%]) Other safety parameters Treatment-emergent AEs related to abnormal clinical laboratory test results which were considered by the investigator to be related to the trial intervention included blood, creatinine increased reported for 1 participant (placebo); blood triglycerides increased reported for 1 participant (4 mg/kg sibeprenlimab); hypertriglyceridaemia and hyperglycaemia reported for 1 participant (8 mg/kg sibeprenlimab); and eosinophil count increased reported for 1 participant (4 mg/kg sibeprenlimab). Treatment-emergent AEs related to vital sign assessments which were considered by the investigator to be related to the trial intervention included postprocedural hypotension reported for 1 participant (placebo). |
|
1. uPCR at Month 12 After 12 months of treatment, there was a statistically significant linear treatment effect for the primary endpoint of change from baseline in 24-hour uPCR (p-value = 0.0004). The geometric mean ratio reduction (SE) for 24-hour uPCR from baseline was 56.66% for pooled sibeprenlimab and 20.20% for placebo. By treatment, the geometric mean ratio reduction (SE) for 24-hour uPCR from baseline was 47.18%, 58.77%, and 62.02% in the sibeprenlimab 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg treatment groups, respectively, demonstrating a dose dependent effect of sibeprenlimab on proteinuria. Compared with placebo, the reductions in 24-hour uPCR were statistically significant across all dose levels with p-values of 0.0477, 0.0013, and 0.0004 for sibeprenlimab 2, 4, 8 mg/kg, respectively. A similar trend for reduction in proteinuria was observed for spot uPCR measurements. 2. uPCR at Months 9 and 16 After 9 months of treatment, the geometric mean ratio reduction (SE) for 24-hour uPCR from baseline was 57.38% for pooled sibeprenlimab and 15.65% for placebo. By treatment, the geometric mean ratio reduction (SE) for 24hour uPCR from baseline was 50.53%, 57.41%, and 62.90%, in the sibeprenlimab 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg groups, respectively. The reductions in uPCR seen at Month 12 were maintained through Month 16 in the sibeprenlimab 4 and 8 mg/kg treatment groups, but began returning towards baseline in the 2 mg/kg treatment group by Month 16. 3. Urine Protein Excretion After 12 months of treatment, the reduction of ratio change (95% CI) from baseline for urine protein excretion was 58.25% (49.2 and 65.7) for pooled sibeprenlimab and 18.75% (-11.6, 40.9) for placebo. By treatment, the reduction of ratio change (95% CI) from baseline for 24 hour uPCR was 49.47% (30.6, 63.2), 57.80% (43.0, 68.8), and 65.49% (53.1, 74.6) in the sibeprenlimab 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg groups, respectively, demonstrating a dose dependent effect of sibeprenlimab on urine protein excretion. The reductions in urine protein excretion seen at Month 12 were maintained through Month 16 in the sibeprenlimab 4 and 8 mg/kg treatment groups and began returning towards baseline in the 2 mg/kg treatment group by Month 16. 4. eGFR Changes from baseline (LSM [SE]) at the end of the 12 month treatment period were -2.74 (1.8), +0.22 (1.7), and -1.54 (1.8) mL/min/1.73 m2, in the 2, 4, and 8 mg/kg sibeprenlimab groups respectively compared with a -7.35 (1.8) mL/min/1.73 m2 decline in the placebo group. The LSMD (95% CI) relative to placebo in eGFR from baseline to Month 12 was +4.61 (-0.3,9.5) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the 2 mg/kg sibeprenlimab treatment group, +7.57 (2.8, 12.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the 4 mg/kg sibeprenlimab treatment group (p = 0.0020), and +5.81 (0.9, 10.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the 8 mg/kg sibeprenlimab treatment group (p = 0.0195). 5. Clinical Remission Proteinuria remission was defined as a reduction in 24-hour urine protein excretion to < 300 mg/day for at least 3 consecutive months or uPCR < 0.2 g/g for at least 3 consecutive months. The percentage of participants with proteinuria remission was 10.5% (Month 9), 7.9% (Month 12), and 7.9% (Month 16) for the 2 mg/kg treatment group; 12.2% (Month 9), 12.2% (Month 12), and 17.1% (Month 16) for the 4 mg/kg treatment group; 18.4% (Month 9), 26.3% (Month 12), and 23.7% (Month 16) for the 8 mg/kg treatment group; and 2.6% (Months 9, 12, and 16) for the placebo group. The percentage of participants with sustained proteinuria remission at Months 12 and 16 was 2.6% for the 2 mg/kg treatment group, 9.8% (Month 12) and 12.2% (Month 16) for the 4 mg/kg treatment group, and 13.2% (Month 12) and 23.7% (Month 16) for the 8 mg/kg treatment group. No participants met the criteria for sustained proteinuria remission at Months 12 and 16 in the placebo group. |
|
In 117 IgAN patients, a monthly IV administration of sibeprenlimab (2, 4, or 8 mg/kg): - Reduced 24-hour uPCR by 47% to 62% at Month 12 in comparison to 20% in the placebo group. - Stabilized eGFR through Month 12 in the 4 and 8 mg/kg treatment groups and slowed eGFR decline in the 2 mg/kg treatment group relative to the placebo group. - Was well tolerated and resulted in so significant or known safety concerns. |
|
Nov. 02, 2023 |
|
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37916620/ |
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2041210130 |
Nishioka Tsuyoshi |
||
Fortrea Japan K.K. |
||
Harumi Triton Square Office Tower Y 8F, 1-8-11 Harumi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-80-2334-6812 |
||
Tsuyoshi.Nishioka@fortrea.com |
||
Nishioka Tsuyoshi |
||
Fortrea Japan K.K. |
||
Harumi Triton Square Office Tower Y 8F, 1-8-11 Harumi, Chuo-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-80-2334-6812 |
||
Tsuyoshi.Nishioka@fortrea.com |
Complete |
Jan. 19, 2022 |
||
| Nov. 30, 2020 | ||
| 19 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
double blind |
||
placebo control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Participant is a male or female >= 18 years of age at the time of signing the informed consent. |
||
1. Participant has secondary forms of IgAN as defined by the treating physician (eg, Henoch Schonlein purpura (IgA vasculitis), infection-associated IgAN, or IgAN associated with hepatic cirrhosis). |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Immunoglobulin A(IgA) Nephropathy |
||
VIS649 or placebo will be administered as a single, monthly IV infusion for 12 monthly doses. |
||
Safety: |
||
| Visterra, Inc. |
| Fujita Medical University Hospital Group Joint Institutional Review Board | |
| 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi | |
+81-562-93-2873 |
|
| gcpjim@fujita-hu.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
June. 17, 2020 |
| NCT04287985 | |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
The United States/Singapore/United Kingdom/Canada/India/Malaysia/Hong Kong/Australia/Philippines/Spain/South Korea/Thailand/Taiwan/Sri Lanka |