|
April. 12, 2021 |
|
|
July. 14, 2022 |
|
|
jRCT2032210032 |
Phase III clinical trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of QFR (Quantitative Flow Ratio) using online measurement |
|
Phase III clinical trial to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of QFR |
|
Mar. 10, 2022 |
|
186 |
|
Mean age 70.8, Male 78.9%, Mean pulse rate 70.0 bpm, Mean LV EF 60.2 |
|
After 14 days screening period participants went under CAG or PCI in which FFR and QFR were measured. Participants were followed up until the day of discharge. |
|
Adverse events in 18/186 patients (9.7%), 24 cases Mild 8, moderate 16, serious 0 |
|
Diagnostic accuracy of QFR in comparison with FFR as gold standard of functional assessment (Full Analysis Set) Sensitivity 90.6, Specificity 89.0, Positive predictive value 86.5, Negative predictive value 92.4 Average time to FFR 11.25 minutes, Average time to QFR 6.34 minutes |
|
QFR showed high diagnostic accuracy in comparison with FFR as gold standard of functional assessment of coronary arteries. |
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2032210032 |
van Schaik-Yamamoto Yuko |
||
M&S |
||
3rd floor, 5-1 Nihonbashi Kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-9086023560 |
||
YVanschaik@medisimaging.com |
||
van Schaik-Yamamoto Yuko |
||
Medis medical imaging systems |
||
3rd floor, 5-1 Nihonbashi Kabutocho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo |
||
+81-3-6778-2589 |
||
YVanschaik@medisimaging.com |
Complete |
April. 19, 2021 |
||
| May. 25, 2021 | ||
| 191 | ||
Interventional |
||
single arm study |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
uncontrolled control |
||
single assignment |
||
diagnostic purpose |
||
- Patients with stable angina or patients who undergo a secondary assessment of stenosis after AMI - 20 years of age or older |
||
- Patients who had myocardial infarction within 72 hours |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Stable angina or stenosis after AMI |
||
FFR will be measured during coronary angiography or coronary intervention in the patients who gave written consent. QFR will be measured by a certified user for all vessels for which FFR assessment is planed. Patients will be treated according to the results of angiography and FFR. QFR values should not be used to determine treatment strategy. |
||
Evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of QFR with FFR as gold standard, and compare the diagnostic accuracy of QFR with that of anatomical assessment by QCA. |
||
| Medis medical imaging systems |
| Wakayama Medical University IRB | |
| 811-1 Kimiidera, Wakayama-shi, Wakayama | |
+81-73-441-0547 |
|
| chiken@wakayama-med.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
April. 28, 2021 |
none |