|
June. 12, 2015 |
|
|
Nov. 12, 2021 |
|
|
jRCT1091220215 |
The Comparison of Treatment Sequence of Parallel rTMS and Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Only |
|
The Comparison of Treatment Sequence of Parallel rTMS and Rehabilitation and Rehabilitation Only |
|
Mar. 31, 2020 |
|
47 |
|
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26335615 |
Naoki Yamada |
||
The Jikei University School of Medicine |
||
4-11-1, Izumihontyo-komaeshi, |
||
+81-70-3914-2190 |
||
n-yamada@jikei.ac.jp |
||
Naoki Yamada |
||
The Jikei University School of Medicine |
||
4-11-1 komae city Tokyo |
||
+81-3-3480-1151 |
||
n-yamada@jikei.ac.jp |
COMPLETED |
April. 03, 2015 |
||
| 50 | ||
Interventional |
||
Experimental Study |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
Yes |
||
N/A |
||
1) motor-dominant aphasia caused by left hemispheric stroke in a right-handed subject; 2) age at intervention between 20-80 years; 3) time between the onset of stroke and treatment of more than 12 months; 4) history of a single stroke only (no bilateral cerebrovascular lesion); 5) no cognitive impairment with a pretreatment Mini Mental State Examination score of more than 26; 6) clinical confirmation of a plateau state (no increases in the WAB and Token Test scores as measured by a speech therapist from the institution in the last 3 months); 7) no active physical or mental illness requiring medical management; 8) no contraindications to atomoxetine administration (serious cardiovascular disturbance, pheochromocytoma, closed angle glaucoma and impaired liver function); and 9) sufficient understanding of the study contents. |
||
contraindications to atomoxetine administration (serious cardiovascular disturbance, pheochromocytoma, closed angle glaucoma and impaired liver function) |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 85age old under | ||
Both |
||
post-stroke hemiparesis |
||
Intervention type:DRUG Name of intervention:Effects of rTMS therapy in assessing stroke hemiparesis Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:DEVICE Route of administration / Site of application:ORAL Dose per administration:2400 2400 stim Dosing frequency / Frequency of use:QD once per day Planned duration of intervention:four weeks Intended dose regimen:Group A consisted of 16 patients who underwent NEURO first, and Group B consisted of 21 patients who underwent OT first for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks of hospitalization, the treatment for Group A and Group B were reversed and continued for an additional two weeks of treatment. detailes of teratment arms:Group A consisted of 16 patients who underwent NEUROR first, and Group B consisted of 21 patients who underwent OT first for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks of hospitalization, the treatment for Group A and Group B were reversed and continued for an additional two weeks of treatment. Comparative intervention name:none Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:DEVICE Route of administration / Site of application:NOT APPLICABLE Dose per administration:2400 2400 stimulation stimulation Dosing frequency / Frequency of use:QD once per day Planned duration of intervention:4week Intended dose regimen:low-frequency rTMS applied to a healthy cerebrum |
||
safety, feasibility, and efficacy |
||
Japanese version of WAB and the Token Test |
||
| The Jikei University School of Medicine | |
| The Jikei University School of Medicine |
| the study funding of the rehabilitation department of Jikei University School of Medicine |
| the ethics committee of The Jikei University School of Medicine | |
| Yes | |
June. 30, 2014 |
| JMA-IIA00215 | |
| Japan |