|
June. 10, 2022 |
|
|
Oct. 17, 2023 |
|
|
jRCT1051220043 |
A prospective, randomized and endoscopist-blinded trial to evaluate comparable efficacy of a 1-L PEG and ascorbic acid with sennoside versus a 2-L PEG and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation (Senno trial) |
|
Trial to evaluate comparable efficacy of a 1-L PEG and ascorbic acid with sennoside versus a 2-L PEG and ascorbic acid for bowel preparation (Senno trial) |
|
Aug. 31, 2022 |
|
344 |
|
There were no significant differences in age, gender, BMI, grade of education, comorbidities, and chronic constipation. Age, years; 68 (57-73) and 67 (57-73), Male/Female; 89/83 and 92/80, BMI, kg/m2; 23 (21-26) and 24 (21-26), Grade of education (Junior high school or less); 32 (19%) and 30 (17%), Comorbidities (Diabetes mellitus); 20 (12%) and 15 (9%), Comorbidities (Hypertension); 76 (44%) and 62 (36%). (1L-PEG/AS and 2L-PEG/A) (Data are n(%) or median (IQR)) |
|
Among 786 patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy, 344 patients were randomized 1:1 to the 1L-PEG/AS group (n=172) or the 2L-PEG/A group (n=172). Among 344 patients eligible for this study, two in the 1L-PEG/AS group and three in 2L-PEG/A group cancelled the examination after randomization (1% vs. 2%). Ultimately, 170 in the 1L-PEG/AS group and 169 in the 2L-PEG/A group were included in the PP analysis. |
|
Nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and discomfort, and quality of sleep, were comparable between the two groups. No patients experienced moderate-to-severe abdominal pain and ischemic colitis. |
|
The 1L-PEG/AS group showed non-inferior adequate BP rates compared with the 2L-PEG/A group (88% vs. 89%, P=1.00); Higher willingness to repeat the BP was observed in the 1L-PEG/AS group (85% vs. 62%, P<0.01). |
|
The 1L-PEG/AS regimen was comparable to the 2L-PEG/A regimen in terms of BP adequacy, requiring lesser BP solution volumes, with better patient tolerance. |
|
Oct. 05, 2023 |
|
Sept. 01, 2023 |
|
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/den.14504 |
No |
|
None |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT1051220043 |
Fukuda Takashi |
||
Minami Osaka Hospital |
||
1-18-18 Higashikagaya, Suminoe-ku, Osaka |
||
+81-6-6685-0221 |
||
t.fukuda@minamiosaka.com |
||
Morimoto Kenichi |
||
Minami Osaka Hospital |
||
1-18-18 Higashikagaya, Suminoe-ku, Osaka |
||
+81-6-6685-0221 |
||
kenichi.morimoto@gmail.com |
Complete |
June. 10, 2022 |
||
| June. 15, 2022 | ||
| 344 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
single blind |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
other |
||
1) patients who were scheduled for elective colonoscopy |
||
1) severe heart failure (NYHA class III or IV) |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 85age old under | ||
Both |
||
patients who require colonoscopy |
||
Patients receive 2-L PEG-Asc or sennoside 24 mg prior to 1-L PEG-Asc. |
||
colonoscopy |
||
Solution, Bowel Preparation |
||
D003113 |
||
D002400 |
||
inadequate bowel preparation rate scored by Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) |
||
procedure-related parameters, safety and tolerability |
||
| Keigakukai Certified Review Board | |
| 1-18-18 Higashikagaya, Suminoe-ku, Osaka, Osaka | |
+81-6-6685-0221 |
|
| Approval | |
Nov. 04, 2021 |
none |