臨床研究・治験計画情報の詳細情報です。(JMACCT)
| 保留 | ||
| 平成24年1月6日 | ||
| 平成26年11月25日 | ||
| 平成23年12月28日 | ||
| Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials | ||
| Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials | ||
| 荻原茂樹 | ||
| 荻原歯科医院 | ||
| To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects. | ||
| 非該当 | ||
| Chronoc periodontitis | ||
| その他 | ||
| local dental society | ||
| 2012年01月06日 | ||
| 2011年12月28日 | ||
| / | ||
| / | ||
| / | Every intervention are safe. | Every intervention are safe. |
| / | Both EF and ED therapies resulted in greater soft tissue improvement at 1 and 3 years follow-up compared with EMD alone. Both graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone |
Both EF and ED therapies resulted in greater soft tissue improvement at 1 and 3 years follow-up compared with EMD alone. Both graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone |
| / | Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone |
Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone |
| RCT | RCT | |
| 公表されている | Yes | |
| 初回出版日 / Date of First Publication | ||
| 結果の開示先 / Results links | Journal of Periodontology | |
| 結果の開示先 / Results links | 20111228144835_Table 3' for trial 2..docx | |
| / | ||
|---|---|---|
| / |
| 研究の種別 | 保留 |
|---|---|
| 登録日 | 2012年01月06日 |
| jRCT番号 | jRCT1090220077 |
| Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials (RCT) | Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials (RCT) | ||
| Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials | Efficacy of Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft VS Enamel Matrix Derivative/ Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft with or without Forced Eruption Treating Infrabony Defects: Two Randomized Trials | ||
| / | 荻原茂樹 | Shigeki Ogihara DDS,Ph.D. | / | 荻原歯科医院 | Ogihara Dental Clinic/ Periodontics &Implat Dentistry |
|---|---|---|---|
| / | Periodontics | Periodontics | |
| / | 足立区足立3-7-16 | 7-16, Adachi 3 chome, Adachi-ku, Tokyo | |
| 03-3849-8483 | |||
| 03-3849-7483 | |||
| oshigeki@fantasy.plala.or.jp | |||
| 荻原茂樹 | Shigeki Ogihara DDS,Ph.D. | ||
| 荻原歯科医院 | Ogihara Dental Clinic/ Periodontics &Implat Dentistry | ||
| Periodontics | Periodontics | ||
| 足立区足立3-7-16 | 7-16, Adachi 3 chome, Adachi-ku, Tokyo | ||
| 03-3849-8483 | |||
| 03-3849-7483 | |||
| oshigeki@fantasy.plala.or.jp | |||
| Date of Approved | 2003年11月28日 | ||
|
|
|||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|---|
|
|
1 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
専門医療病院・医院 | SPECIALTY CARE HOSPITAL or CLINIC | |
|
|
日本 | Japan | |
|
|
東京都 | Tokyo | |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone | In trial 1:Both FDBA and DFDBA graft materials worked well in the managing of deep infrabony defects when combined with EMD. In trial 2:This study showed that both forced eruption/EMD/FDBA and forced eruption/EMD/DFDBA combination therapies result in greater soft tissue improvements at 1- and 3- year follow-up in addition to greater hard tissue improvements at 6- months re-entry compared than forced eruption/EMD alone | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects. | To determine the efficacy of EMD/FDBA VS EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruptionon changes in infrabony defects. | |
|
|
非該当 | N/A | |
| 2003年12月03日 | |||
| 2004年04月01日 | |||
|
|
2004年04月01日 | ||
| 2011年10月30日 | |||
| 2011年12月28日 | |||
| 2012年07月28日 | |||
| 2012年07月28日 | |||
|
|
2011年12月28日 | ||
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
観察研究 | Observational | |
| 有効性 | EFFICACY | ||
|
Study Design |
|
Randomised pararell clinical trial | Randomised pararell clinical trial |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
プラセボ対照 | placebo control | |
|
|
単盲検 | single blind | |
|
|
治療 | treatment purpose | |
|
|
あり | Yes | |
|
|
個人 | INDIVIDUAL | |
|
|
なし | No | |
|
|
なし | No | |
|
|
なし | No | |
|
|
その他 | OTHER | |
|
|
日本 | Japan | |
|
Key Inclusion & Exclusion Criteria |
|
6mm>CAL and radiographic bone loss | 6mm>CAL and radiographic bone loss |
|
|
1) systematic diseases influencing periodontal surgery; 2) systematic medications affecting periodontal status; 3) pregnancy or lactation; 4) smoker; 5) sensitivity to minocycline and tetracycline. | 1) systematic diseases influencing periodontal surgery; 2) systematic medications affecting periodontal status; 3) pregnancy or lactation; 4) smoker; 5) sensitivity to minocycline and tetracycline. | |
|
|
歳 ヶ月 週 日 時間 下限なし | Age Month Week Day Hour No limit | |
|
|
歳 ヶ月 週 日 時間 上限なし | Age Month Week Day Hour No limit | |
|
|
男性・女性 | Both | |
|
|
あり | Yes | |
|
|
Chronoc periodontitis | Chronoc periodontitis | |
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
いいえ | No | |
|
|
なし | No | |
|
|
|||
|
|
介入の種類:医薬品,手技 介入の名称:EMD alone vs EMD/FDBA vs EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruption 医薬品の剤型/医療機器の一般的名称:非該当,その他 投与経路/適用部位:非該当,非該当 投与量/使用量: 投与回数/使用回数: 継続期間:4週間 投与レジメン: 治療群の詳細:EMD/FDBA, EMD/FDBA, Ortho/EMD/DFDBA, Ortho/EMD/FDBA 対照の名称:あり 医薬品の剤型/医療機器の一般的名称:その他 投与経路/適用部位: 投与量/使用量:none 投与回数/使用回数: 継続期間: 投与レジメン: |
Intervention type:DRUG,PROCEDURE Name of intervention:EMD alone vs EMD/FDBA vs EMD/DFDBA with or without forced eruption Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:NOT APPLICABLE,OTHER Route of administration / Site of application:NOT APPLICABLE,NOT APPLICABLE Dose per administration: Dosing frequency / Frequency of use: Planned duration of intervention:4 weeks Intended dose regimen: detailes of teratment arms:EMD/FDBA, EMD/FDBA, Ortho/EMD/DFDBA, Ortho/EMD/FDBA Comparative intervention name:EMD alone without graft material (negative control) with or without forced eruption Dose form / Japanese Medical Device Nomenclature:OTHER Route of administration / Site of application: Dose per administration:none Dosing frequency / Frequency of use: Planned duration of intervention: Intended dose regimen: |
|
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Primary Outcome(s) |
|
The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up. | The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up. |
|
|
1 year and 3 years follow-up | 1 year and 3 years follow-up | |
|
|
The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-yearand 3 years follow-up. | The primary outcome measurewas absolute change in PD reduction and CAL gain from baseline to 1-year and 3 years follow-up. | |
|
Secondary Outcome(s) |
|
OPAL gain | OPAL gain from baseline to 6 month |
|
|
6 months reentry surgery | 6 months reentry surgery | |
|
|
OPAL gain | OPAL gain from baseline to 6 month | |
|
|
医薬品 | DRUG | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
その他 | OTHER |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
試験終了 | COMPLETED | |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
Dr Shigeki Ogihara | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Dr Shigeki Ogihara | |
|
|
なし | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
none | |
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
No funding | No funding |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
local dental society | local dental society |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
承認 | Yes |
|
|
||
|
|
なし | No |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
Nill Known | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
JMA-IIA00077 | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|---|
|
|
変更履歴.csv | |
|---|---|---|
|
|
ChangeTracking.csv | |
|
|
||
|---|---|---|
|
|
設定されていません |
|
|
|
設定されていません |
|
|
|
設定されていません |
|