|
Feb. 07, 2023 |
|
|
Jan. 31, 2025 |
|
|
jRCTs051220165 |
Prospective a multicenter, open-label, parallel group comparative, trial to evaluate the antihypertensive efficacy and safety of Sacubitril/Valsartan and Amlodipine besylate in patients with essential hypertension (PARASOL study) |
|
PARASOL study (PARASOL study) |
|
Oct. 25, 2023 |
|
359 |
|
Of 422 screened patients, 359 were randomized. A total of 181 patients were allocated to the sacubitril/valsartan group, and the remaining 178 patients were allocated to the amlodipine group. However, the actual number of patients in each group was 182 and 177, respectively, due to a prescription error. In the sacubitril/valsartan group, 136 (76.0%) were males and 43 (24.0%) were females. In the amlodipine group, 130 (73.9%) were males and 46 (26.1%) were females. The average age was 58.4 in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 58.0 in the amlodipine group. Mean BMI was 25.86 kg/m2 in sacubitril/valsartan group, and 25.53 kg/m2 in amlodipine group. Regarding hypertension grade, 48.6% were grade I, 39.7% were grade II in the sacubitril/valsartan group, 47.2% were grade I, and 40.9% were grade II in the amlodipine group. For nocturnal hypertension type, 63.7% were Dippers, and 35.8% were No-Dippers in the sacubitril/valsartan group, 54.0% were Dippers, and 45.5% were non-dippers in the amlodipine group. The proportion of patients who had a treatment history for hypertension was 73.7% in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 70.5% in the amlodipine group. The mean duration of hypertension was 1632.1 days in the sacubitril/valsartan group and 1564.6 days in the amlodipine group. |
|
Of 359 randomized patients, 349 completed the study treatment, and 10 discontinued it. One patient in the sacubitril/valsartan group discontinued due to an adverse event, dizziness. The remaining six patients in the sacubitril/valsartan group and three patients in the amlodipine group discontinued due to investigators' decisions for reasons other than AEs/patients' reasons. |
|
A total of 21 adverse events (AEs) related to the study were reported in 13 patients (7.1%) in the sacubitril/valsartan group, and 11 AEs were reported in 11 patients (6.2%) in the amlodipine group. A total of 21 AEs related to the test drug were reported in 14 patients (7.7%) in the sacubitril/valsartan group, and 12 AEs related to the control drug were reported in 9 patients (5.1%) in the amlodipine group. |
|
As the primary endpoint analysis, the mean 24-hour SBP reduction in sacubitril/valsartan was confirmed to be non-inferior to that in amlodipine [between-treatment difference -0.62 mmHg (95% confidential interval -3.23 to 1.98; p=0.003 for non-inferiority; independent t-test with non-inferiority margin 3.0 mmHg)]. As for secondary endpoint analysis, no significant differences were observed in changes from baseline in 24-hour SBP, DBP or pulse pressure. No between-treatment differences were observed regarding morning, daytime and nighttime BPs, as well as office BPs. The BP control rates (24-hour BP, office BP and wrist BP) at Week 8 also showed no treatment differences. |
|
This study assessed the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan versus amlodipine in patients with essential hypertension. The mean change in 24-hour SBP in sacubitril/valsartan was non-inferior to that in amlodipine, and the difference in the incidence of drug-related AEs was not significant. These results suggest that the BP-lowering effect of sacubitril/valsartan is comparable to amlodipine, and there are no marked differences in tolerability between them. |
|
Jan. 31, 2025 |
|
Dec. 04, 2024 |
|
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.14938 |
No |
|
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051220165 |
Yamamoto Koichi |
||
Osaka University Hospital |
||
2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka |
||
+81-6-6879-3852 |
||
kyamamoto@geriat.med.osaka-u.ac.jp |
||
Yamamoto Koichi |
||
Osaka University Hospital |
||
2-15 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka |
||
+81-6-6879-3852 |
||
kyamamoto@geriat.med.osaka-u.ac.jp |
Complete |
Feb. 07, 2023 |
||
| Feb. 27, 2023 | ||
| 350 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
(1)Patients at the age of 18 to 79 at the time of obtaining consent. |
||
(1)Patients who are 110 mmHg or higher on office diastolic blood pressure. |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| 79age old under | ||
Both |
||
essential hypertension |
||
Test drug administration group: |
||
Blood pressure change in 24-hour SBP from baseline to Week 8. |
||
(1)Blood pressure change in 24-hour SBP from baseline to Week 8. |
||
| Novartis Pharma K.K. | |
| Applicable |
| Osaka University Clinical Research Review Committee | |
| 2-2 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka | |
+81-6-6210-8296 |
|
| handai-nintei@hp-crc.med.osaka-u.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
Jan. 24, 2023 |
none |