|
Sept. 24, 2019 |
|
|
Nov. 05, 2023 |
|
|
jRCT2080224884 |
A Phase Ib study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with Nivolumab and Photoimmunotherapy (PIT) using ASP-1929 for the patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer or esophageal cancer |
|
GE-PIT Study |
|
May. 15, 2022 |
|
21 |
|
ITT (Intention to treat) population in the Dose escalation part and in the Expansion part was 9 patients and 12 patients, respectively. Age in the Dose escalation part and in the Expansion part was 69.7 +- 7.3 years (mean +- SD) and 70.3 +- 11.3 years, respectively; BMI was 19.60 +- 5.41 kg/m2 and 21.49 +- 2.77 kg/m2, respectively. No patients with double cancer or photosensitivity had been observed. EGFR expression in the Dose escalation part and in the Expansion part was 1+ in 1 patient (11.1%) and 1 patient (8.3%), respectively, 2+ in 5 patients (55.6%) and 7 patients (58.3%), respectively, and 3+ in 3 patients (33.3%) and 4 patients (33.3%), respectively; PD-L1 positive in 4 patients (44.4%) and 7 patients (58.3%), respectively, and PD-L1 negative in 5 patients (55.6%) and 5 patients (41.7%), respectively. Although this study planned to be conducted in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer or esophageal cancer, all 21 patients had gastric cancer and no patients with esophageal cancer were enrolled. |
|
<Dose escalation part> Signed informed consent: 9 patients Registered: 9 patients <Expansion part> Signed informed consent: 13 patients Registered: 12 patients |
|
Adverse events leading to death occurred in 3 patients in the Dose escalation part: pneumonia pneumococcal, malignant neoplasm progression, and pleural effusion (1 patient each). None of them were assessed as related to the study treatment. Other serious adverse events occurred in 3 patients in the Expansion part: oesophagitis, septic shock, and pneumonitis (1 patient each). All of them were serious due to [hospitalization or prolonged hospitalization]. Additionally, septic shock was assessed as [life-threatening]. Septic shock and pneumonitis were assessed as adverse drug reactions to nivolumab, while oesophagitis was assessed as an adverse drug reaction to ASP-1929-PIT. Adverse events were reported in 10 patients (83.3%) in the Expansion part and those that occurred in >=2 patients were pyrexia and rash (33.3%; 4 events in 4 patients for each event), stomatitis (16.7%; 3 events in 2 patients), and ascites, oesophagitis, application site pain, hepatic function abnormal, decreased appetite, and pruritus (16.7%; 2 events in 2 patients for each event). Adverse drug reactions were reported in 10 patients (83.3%) and those that occurred in >=2 patients were rash (25.0%; 3 events in 3 patients), stomatitis (16.7%, 3 events in 2 patients), and oesophagitis, application site pain, pyrexia, and hepatic function abnormal (16.7%; 2 events in 2 patients for each event). That of Grade 4 was septic shock (8.3%; 1 patient), which occurred in the Expansion part; the event of septic shock was assessed as an adverse drug reaction to nivolumab. Treatment discontinuation was reported in 4 patients (33.3%) in the Expansion part : stomatitis, hepatic function abnormal, herpes zoster, septic shock, decreased apetitie, pneumonitis and rash (1 patient each). All of them, other than herpes zoster, were assessed as adverse drug reactions to nivolumab. In the Dose escalation part, pneumonia which occured in 1 patient was assessed as an adverse drug reaction to nivolumab. Nivolumab was discontinued in all 5 patients and ASP-1929 was additionally discontinued in 1 patient with pneumonitis. In the Dose escalation part, device malfunctions of [unable to remove stylet], [thermal damage to balloons and diffusers], and [cannot insert light diffuser] occurred in 1 patient and [irradiation did not start] occurred in another patient. There were no adverse events or health hazards to individuals other than patients due to laser equipment malfunctions. |
|
<For Dose escalation part only> Proportion of incidence of DLTs (Dose-limiting toxicity): No DLT was observed (DLT incidence was 0%) for the 9 patients of DLT Evaluation Population during the DLT evaluation period (Days 8 - 14, in the Dose escalation part). |
|
< For both Dose escalation part and Expansion part > Efficacy results: In the Expansion part of 12 patients, the number of patients who achieved either CR (Complete response) or PR (Partial response) in terms of the investigator-assessed best overall response per RECIST guideline ver. 1.1 was 1 patient (who achieved PR), and the ORR(Objective response rate) was 8.3% (95% CI, 0.2% - 38.5%). Four (4) patients achieved PD (Progressive disease) in terms of the investigator-assessed best overall response per RECIST guideline ver. 1.1. Their PDs were not considered pseudoprogression at the time of confirmed response; therefore, response evaluation per iRECIST was not performed. As for the investigator-assessed best local response, no patients achieved L-CR (Local complete response), and the L-CR rate was 0% (95% CI, 0.0% - 26.5%). The median L-PFS (Local progression-free survival) was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.6 - 5.7 months), the median PFS (Progression-free survival) was 2.1 months (95% CI, 1.0 - 2.4 months), and the median OS (Overall survival) was 5.7 months (95% CI, 2.6 - 9.1 months). In the Dose escalation part, the number of patients who achieved either CR or PR in terms of the investigator-assessed best overall response per RECIST guideline ver. 1.1 was 1 patient (who achieved PR). As for the investigator-assessed best local response, no patients achieved L-CR. The L-PFS ranged from 0.7 to 13.4 months, PFS ranged from 0.7 to 13.4 months, and the OS ranged from 0.7 to 29.5 months. Safety results: In the combination therapy with an anti-PD-1 antibody drug (nivolumab) and PIT using the investigational drug of ASP-1929, no new safety concerns were raised under 100J/cm2 determined as the RD (Recommended dose) for energy density of laser illumination. For details, refer to [Adverse events]. |
|
The combination therapy with an anti-PD-1 antibody drug (nivolumab) and PIT using the investigational drug of ASP-1929 raised no new safety concerns in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer. As for efficacy, it is considered limited and further investigation is necessary, including pre- and post-treatment development of EGFR and biomarker measurements. |
|
No |
|
| version: date: |
Kohei Shitara |
||
National Cancer Center Hospital East |
||
6-5-1,Kashiwanoha,Kashiwa,Chiba,277-8577,Japan |
||
+81-4-7133-1111 |
||
GE_PIT_core@east.ncc.go.jp |
Kohei Shitara |
||
National Cancer Center Hospital East |
||
6-5-1,Kashiwanoha,Kashiwa,Chiba,277-8577,Japan |
||
+81-4-7133-1111 |
||
GE_PIT_core@east.ncc.go.jp |
completed |
Nov. 01, 2019 |
||
| 38 | ||
Interventional |
||
open-label, single-arm Phase Ib study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1 |
||
Inclusion criteria including below but not limited to: |
||
Exclusion criteria including below but not limited to: |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer or esophageal cancer |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
safety |
||
safety |
||
| - | |
| - |
| Rakuten Medical, Inc. | |
| - |
| IRB of the National Cancer Center | |
| 6-5-1,Kashiwanoha,Kashiwa,Chiba,277-8577,Japan | |
+81-4-7133-1111 |
|
| irboffice@east.ncc.go.jp | |
| approved | |
Sept. 18, 2019 |
| JapicCTI-194969 | |
| JapicCTI |
| Japan |