|
April. 19, 2018 |
|
|
Oct. 14, 2021 |
|
|
jRCT2080223878 |
An Active-controlled, Randomized, Cross-over study of K-LA5 |
|
An Active-controlled, Randomized, Cross-over study of K-LA5 |
|
Dec. 21, 2018 |
|
55 |
|
Of 55 FAS patients, the proportion of men was 61.3% (19/31) in group A (test-lead group), 79.2% (19/24) in B group (control-lead group), and that of women was 38.7% (12/31) in group A, 20.8% (5/24) in group B. The mean age (SD) was 60.5 (13.8) years in group A, 63.6 (11.7) years in group B. |
|
Of 55 patients (31 patients in group A, 24 patients in group B) enrolled in this clinical study, a total of 3 patients were not completed and 52 patients (30 patients in group A, 22 patients in group B) were completed after enrollment. |
|
The incidence of adverse events was 35.2% (19/54) for K-LA5 and 46.3% (25/54) for Kindaly AF-4 (K-4) in SAS. Adverse reactions were observed for neither K-LA5 nor K-4. 1 serious adverse event occurred in 1 subject for K-LA5 and 2 serious adverse events occurred in 2 subjects for K-4, all of which were not related to the study drug. |
|
Concerning the correction of azotemia (BUN, Cre, and UA), since the removal rate of K-LA5 was 90% or more in the tolerance interval for all items, it was shown that K-LA5 was similar to K-4. |
|
It was confirmed that K-LA5 was not remarkably different from K-4 in the correction of serum electrolytes (Na, K, adjusted Ca, and Mg) and the correction of blood acid-base balance (HCO3-).Comparing the change in serum electrolytes in the duration of administration and dialysis, K, Cl, and Mg concentration increased and iCa concentration decreased for K-LA5 compared with K-4. Electrolytes and blood gas including items with significant differences showed effects in line with differences in composition. |
|
Evaluation of the elimination of substances related to azotemia (BUN, Cre, UA) as the primary endpoint showed K-LA5 was similar to K-4. The incidence of adverse events did not differ between the two agents, and no adverse reactions were observed for K-LA5; thus, K-LA5 was considered to have a similar safety profile to that of K-4. |
|
Jan. 10, 2021 |
|
https://mol.medicalonline.jp/library/journal/abstract?GoodsID=aa9syrsc/2021/007001/001&name=0002-0042j&UserID=1200001753-18,https://www.iyaku.info/magazine/?ca3=70&ca4=1&ca=2021&ca2=1&sk=&x=90&y=17&sf=1#st |
No |
|
| version: date: |
FUSO Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. |
||
rinsyo@fuso-pharm.co.jp |
FUSO Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. |
||
rinsyo@fuso-pharm.co.jp |
completed |
May. 02, 2018 |
||
| 50 | ||
Interventional |
||
A multicenter, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, two-period two-treatment cross-over study |
||
treatment purpose |
||
3 |
||
(1) Patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis for 3 to less than 6 hours per session, 3 times a week, in the last week before the period of pre-observation |
||
(1) Patients within 12 weeks of initiating hemodialysis at the time of informed consent |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 80age old under | ||
Both |
||
Patients with chronic renal failure undergoing hemodialysis |
||
investigational material(s) |
||
confirmatory |
||
efficacy |
||
| FUSO Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd. | |
| - |
| - | |
| - |
| Yokohama Minoru Clinic Institutional Review Board | |
| 1-13-8 Bessho, Minami-ku, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa, Japan | |
| approved | |
April. 12, 2018 |
| JapicCTI-183935 | |
| Japan |