|
Sept. 04, 2019 |
|
|
Feb. 04, 2026 |
|
|
jRCT2051190044 |
Phase 2 clinical trial of boron neutron capture therapy for recurrent high-grade |
|
Investigator-lead clinical trial of accelerator-based BNCT for high-grade |
|
July. 24, 2024 |
|
18 |
|
Seventeen subjects were adopted as PPS. All of them were Asian. Eleven subjects were assigned for experimental arm. Six of them were male and the other 5 were female. Median age was 66.0-year-old (range:56~74). Eight subjects belonged to WHO grade 2 and the other three belonged to WHO grade 3. Regarding KPS, 2 subjects were classified to 100%, 6 were classified to 90%, 3 were classified to 80%. Six subjects were assigned for control arm. One of 6 was male and the other 5 were female. Median age was 65.5-year-old (range:61~71). Four subjects belonged to WHO grade 2 and the other 2 belonged to WHO grade 3. Regarding KPS, 3 subjects were classified to 80%, the other 3 were classified to 90, 70 and 60%, respectively. Median KPS was 90% in treatment arm and 80% in control arm. |
|
No other clinical trial affects to this clinical trial design. |
|
Severe adverse event (SAEs) were not found in control arm. In test treatment arm, SAE occurred in 5 cases (41.7%), 10 events, however no SAE to death was found. In detail, sepsis in 2 cases (16.7%), 2 events and others were agitation, seizure, radiation necrosis, phlegmon, pulmonary embolism, cerebral cyst, wound dehiscence and cerebral hemorrhage. Hospitalization or elongation of hospitalization were the reason of judging SAEs. Phlegmon, pulmonary embolism, and cerebral hemorrhage were the severe adverse events that were not reported in BNCT field at the onset of the event. BNCT (the test drug, neutron generator and combination of them) were not judged as causal relationship to these SAEs. |
|
In this clinical trial, primary endpoint was progression free survival 1 (PFS1) judged by central reviewers, considering pseudoprogression. PFS1 six months, 12 months, 24 months and 36 months of the treatment arm were 100.0%, 60.0%, 25.0% and 12.5%, respectively. On the other hand, PFS1 six months and 12 months of the control arm are 44.4% and 0.0%. There was statistical significance between both arms (P=0.0157). Median PFS1 using Kaplan-Meyer method of treatment arm was 14.4 months (95% CI:7.9,26.4) and that of control arm was 1.4 months (95% CI:1.0,9.0) Hazard ratio using Cox proportional hazard model was 0.19 (95% CI:0.05,0.83)and statistical significant. One of the secondary endpoints PFS3 which was judged by investigators considering pseudoprogression also showed the similar results. While, one of the secondary endpoints was PFS2, judged by central reviewers using the PFS based on first progress disease date. PFS2 6 months, 12 months, 18 months of the treatment arm were 80.8%, 30.3% and 0.0%. PFS2 6 and 12 months of the control arm were 44.4% and 0.0%, respectively. There was no statistical significance between both arms (P=0.1331). Median PFS3 of the test treatment arm and control arm were 7.9 (95% CI:3.4,13.3) and 1.4 (95%CI:1.0,9.0) months, respectively. Hazard ratio was 0.4 (95% CI:0.11,1.42) and was not statistically significant. Three out of 11 subjects in treatment arms were judged as PD based on PFS2 in 32 weeks. While these 3 cases judged as PD based on PFS1 in 96 more than 156 weeks. This seemed to cause big dissociation between PFS1 and PFS2. In PPS, OS 12, 24 and 36 months in treatment arm were 100.0, 90.9 and 63.6%. While OS12 and 24 months in control arm were 100.0 and 0.0%. Median OS were 46.9 (95%CI: 27.1,46.9) months in treatment arm and 18.8 (95%CI: not determined), respectively. Hazard ratio was 0.10 (95%CI:0.01,1.53) and not statistically significant. OS-36 months in the treatment arm was 50.0% for WHO grade 2 and 100% for grade 3 and 63.6% for grade 2 and 3. Median OS was 40.5 (95%CI:17.8,46.9) in grade 2, not determined (95%CI:37.9,NE) in grade 3 and 46.9 (95%CI:27.1,46.9) months, respectively. In the report by Raizer, et al. (J Neurooncol. 117:93-101, 2014), OS 36 months was 43% for grade 2, 38% for grade 3 and 41% for grade 2 and 3. Median OS for grade2, 3, 2 and 3 were 26, 23 and 26 months, respectively. Judging from Raizers data, BNCT test treatment arm showed good OS in every WHO grades. |
|
Accelerator-based BNCT showed good control in recurrent high-grade meningiomas. BNCT arm of PFS1 (primary endpoint) was excellent and statistically significant, compared to control, best-supportive care arm. Median PFS1 in the treatment arm was 14.4 months and hazard ratio was 0.19. Median OS of the treatment arm was 46.9 months. BNCT showed best OS data than the previous best chemotherapy trial (mOS:26 months). Accelerator-based BNCT seemed to be effective for recurrent high-grade meningiomas. |
|
Jan. 21, 2026 |
|
Jan. 21, 2026 |
|
https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noaf279 |
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2051190044 |
Miyatake Shin-ichi |
||
Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University , Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital |
||
2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka |
||
+81-72-683-1221 |
||
shinichi.miyatake@ompu.ac.jp |
||
Miyatake Shin-ichi |
||
Kansai BNCT Medical Center, Educational Foundation of Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University |
||
2-7 Daigakumachi, Takatsuki, Osaka |
||
+81-72-683-1221 |
||
shinichi.miyatake@ompu.ac.jp |
Complete |
Sept. 04, 2019 |
||
| 18 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
no treatment control/standard of care control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1.KPS at recurrence is 60 percent or more. |
||
1.Main target lesions are in infratentorial regions. |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| 75age old not | ||
Both |
||
recurrent high-grade meningioma (WHO grade 2 or 3) |
||
18 candidates matched with inclusion criteria an d not conflicted with exclusion criteria, are divide d into 2 groups by stratified and blocking randomization. |
||
high-grade meningioma |
||
Boron Neutron Capture Therapy, BNCT |
||
D008579 |
||
D016754 |
||
Progression free survival depending on Macdonald assessment judged by central review committee |
||
1) Overall survival |
||
| AMED |
| Osaka Medical and Pharmaceutical University Hospital Institutional Review Board | |
| 2-7 Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki , Osaka | |
+81-72-683-1221 |
|
| ompu_irb@ompu.ac.jp | |
| Approval | |
June. 26, 2019 |
none |