|
Feb. 09, 2021 |
|
|
Dec. 16, 2023 |
|
|
jRCT2041200099 |
A GLOBAL, MULTICENTER, RANDOMIZED, PLACEBOCONTROLLED PHASE 3 TRIAL TO COMPARE THE EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF FRUQUINTINIB PLUS BEST SUPPORTIVE CARE TO |
|
A global, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 study of fruquintinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (FRESCO-2) |
|
July. 29, 2022 |
|
691 |
|
A total of 691 participants were randomized in this study, 461 of them were enrolled in fruquintinib plus best supportive care (BSC) group and 230 patients were enrolled in placebo plus BSC group. The mean (standard deviation [SD]) age of 691 subjects at the time of entry was 62.2 (10.16) years, 385 (55.72%) were male and 306 (44.28%) were female. |
|
[Fruquintinib plus BSC group (Not completed: 461 participants)] Three hundred seventeen participants didn't complete this study due to death, and 14 participants withdrew consent. One participant also didn't complete this study due to AE. Three participants were lost follow-up and 2 participants were unspecified the reason for incompletion. One hundred twenty-four participants were still ongoing this study as of data cut-off analysis date. [Placebo plus BSC group (Not completed: 230 participants)] One hundred seventy-three participants didn't complete this study due to death, and 8 participants withdrew consent. Three participants were unspecified the reason for incompletion. Forty-six participants were still ongoing this study as of data cut-off analysis date. |
|
In the safety analyses population, all 686 participants received at least 1 dose of Fruquintinib plus BSC (456) vs Placebo plus BSC (230). Median duration of exposure was longer in fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC group. Nearly all participants (98.9%) in fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC (92.6%) had TEAEs. The most frequently reported TEAEs of any grade >20% of participants in fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC group were hypertension (36.8% vs 8.7%), asthenia (34.0% vs 22.6%), decreased appetite (27.2% vs 17.4%), diarrhoea (24.1% vs 10.4%), hypothyroidism (20.6% vs 0.4%) and fatigue (20.0% vs 16.1%). The most frequently reported Grade >3 TEAEs [>5% participants] were (fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC) hypertension (13.6% vs 0.9%), asthenia (7.7% vs 3.9%), palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia (PPE) syndrome (6.4% vs 0%), and disease progression (6.1% vs 12.2%). Serious TEAEs between fruquintinib plus BSC and placebo plus BSC were balanced (37.7% vs 38.3%). The most frequently reported Grade >3 treatment-emergent serious TEAEs (>2% participants) in the fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC group weredisease progression (5.9% vs 12.2%), general physical health deterioration at 2.2% vs 2.2% and intestinal obstruction (1.3% vs 2.6%). TEAEs leading to dose reduction any grade were seen in 110 participants-fruquintinib vs placebo (24.1% vs 3.9%). The most frequently reported (>1%) treatment related of these events (fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC) included PPE (5.0% vs 0%), asthenia (3.3% vs 1.3%), hypertension (2.9% vs 0.4%), diarrhoea (1.8% vs 0%), proteinuria (1.3% vs 0%), and fatigue (1.1% vs 0%). TEAEs leading to discontinuation of study drug were balanced between fruquintinib plus BSC (20.4%) vs placebo plus (21.3%). The most frequently reported (>1%) of these events were asthenia (1.5% vs 0.9%), disease progression (1.3% vs 3.5%) and general physical health deterioration (1.1% vs 2.2%). There was a lower incidence of deaths in fruquintinib plus BSC (10.7%) vs placebo plus BSC (19.6%). Most frequent cause of death was disease progression-fruquintinib plus BSC (5.9%) vs placebo plus BSC (11.7%). A total of 368 participants (80.7%) in the fruquintinib plus BSC group and 122 participants (53.0%) in the placebo plus BSC group had treatment emergent AESI. The most frequently reported AESI of any grade in >20% (in the fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC, respectively) were hypertension (38.4% vs 8.7%), dermatological toxicity (34.4% vs 11.7%), thyroid dysfunction (27.0% vs 1.7%), hepatic function abnormal (24.8% vs 19/1%) and infections (21.1% vs 12.6%). |
|
Primary Outcome Measures Overall Survival (OS) was defined as the time (months) from date of randomization to death from any cause (up to 22 months). Participants without report of death at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last known alive. The median of OS [95% confidence interval (CI)] for each group is as follows. - Fruquintinib plus BSC group (461 participants): 7.4 months (95%CI: 6.7 to 8.2) - Placebo plus BSC group (230 participants): 4.8 months (95%CI:4.0 to 5.8) Secondary Outcome Measures [Progression Free Survival (PFS)] PFS was defined as the time (months) from randomization until the first radiographic documentation of objective progression as assessed by investigator using RECIST v1.1, or death from any cause, whichever comes first (up to 22 months). The median of PFS (95%CI) for each group is as follows. - Fruquintinib plus BSC group (461 participants): 3.7 months (95%CI: 3.5 to 3.8) - Placebo plus BSC group (230 participants): 1.8 months (95%CI:1.8 to 1.9) [Objective Response Rate (ORR)] ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved a best overall response of confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator from randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months). The ORR (95%CI) for each group is as follows. - Fruquintinib plus BSC group (461 participants): 1.5% (95%CI: 0.6 to 3.1) - Placebo plus BSC group (230 participants): 0% (95%CI: 0.0 to 1.6) [Disease Control Rate (DCR)] DCR was defined as percentage of participants achieving a best overall response of confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) (for at least 7 weeks) per RECIST v1.1, as determined by the investigator from randomization until the first documentation of best overall response (up to 22 months). The DCR (95%CI) for each group is as follows. - Fruquintinib plus BSC group (461 participants): 55.5% (95%CI: 50.9 to 60.1) - Placebo plus BSC group (230 participants): 16.1% (95%CI: 11.6 to 21.5) [Duration of Response (DOR)] DCR was defined as the time (in months) from the first occurrence of PR or CR by RECIST Version 1.1, until the first date that progressive disease is documented by RECIST Version 1.1, or death, whichever comes first (up to 22 months). Only those participants with confirmed responses of CR or PR were included in this analysis. The median of DOR (95%CI) for each group is as follows. - Fruquintinib plus BSC group (7 participants): 10.7 months (95%CI: 3.9 to NA) - Placebo plus BSC group (no participants): 0 |
|
This is a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 of fruquintinib plus BSC vs placebo plus BSC in metastatic colorectal cancer participants who have progressed on, or were intolerant to, chemotherapy, anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR biologics, and TAS-102 or regorafenib. Participants with MSI-H/MMR deficient or BRAF-mutant tumors must have been treated with respective standard of care. 691 participants were randomized. Data reported based on data cut-off date 24 June 2022. |
|
July. 28, 2023 |
|
July. 01, 2023 |
|
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(23)00772-9/fulltext |
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2041200099 |
Schelman William |
||
Hutchison MediPharma International Inc. |
||
25A Vreeland Road, Suite 304, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA |
||
973-306-4490 |
||
williams@hmplglobal.com |
||
Schelman William |
||
Hutchison MediPharma International Inc. |
||
25A Vreeland Road, Suite 304, Florham Park, NJ 07932, USA |
||
973-306-4490 |
||
williams@hmplglobal.com |
Complete |
Oct. 01, 2020 |
||
| Nov. 27, 2020 | ||
| 56 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
double blind |
||
placebo control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Provide written informed consent; |
||
1. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.5 x 109/L, platelet count < 100 x 109/L, or hemoglobin < 9.0 g/dL. Blood transfusion within 1 week prior to enrollment for the purpose of increasing the likelihood of eligibility is not allowed; |
||
| 20age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Refractory metastatic colorectal cancer |
||
Safety Lead-in Cohort: Fruquintinib will be administered 5 mg orally QD 3 weeks on/1 week off for every 4- |
||
Safety Lead-in Cohort: evaluation of the safety and tolerability of fruquintinib in Japanese patients with mCRC by assessing treatmentemergent adverse events, serious adverse events (SAEs), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), deaths, laboratory abnormalities, and other safety data. |
||
PFS, ORR, DCR, and DoR. |
||
| Hutchison MediPharma Limited |
| Aichi Cancer Center Institutional Review Board | |
| 1-1 Kanokoden, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi | |
+81-52-762-6111 |
|
| Approval | |
Oct. 14, 2020 |
Austria/Belgium,/France/Germany/Republic of Hungary/Italy/Spain/UK/USA |