|
Sept. 13, 2021 |
|
|
Feb. 27, 2026 |
|
|
jRCT2011210034 |
The BURAN Study of Buparlisib (AN2025) In Combination with Paclitaxel Compared to Paclitaxel Alone, in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
|
The BURAN Study of Buparlisib (AN2025) In Combination with Paclitaxel Compared to Paclitaxel Alone, in Patients with Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma |
|
Mar. 15, 2025 |
|
487 |
|
A total of 487 patients were randomized in the study, with 323 patients randomized to receive buparlisib in combination with paclitaxel and 164 patients randomized to receive paclitaxel alone. Patients were equal or greater than 18 years of age with histologically and/or cytologically-confirmed refractory, recurrent, or metastatic HNSCC, progressing after prior anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) / anti-programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) monotherapyprior anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 therapy in combination with platinum-based therapy or after sequential treatment of anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1, either prior to or post platinum-based therapy. Patients had a confirmed HPV status, received no more than 2 prior lines of systemic treatment for recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, measurable disease as determined per RECIST Version 1.1, and an ECOG performance status of equal or less than 1. |
|
The trial was initiated in Japan in December 2020, but enrollment progressed at a slower pace than initially planned. Enrollment was also challenging in other participating countries. As a result, the enrollment period was extended beyond the originally planned completion date of December 2022, and patient enrollment was completed in November 2023 with a total of 487 patients. In Japan, a total of 56 patients were enrolled across 14 study sites. Of these, 7 patients were excluded during screening, and 49 patients were randomized. The top three sites of enrollment were Kagawa University Hospital (9 patients), Tohoku University Hospital (7 patients), and Kobe University Hospital (7 patients). |
|
In the Safety Population, all 321 patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 159/160 (99.4%) of patients in the paclitaxel alone arm experienced at least 1 TEAE. The most common TEAEs were diarrhoea (43.0%), anaemia (41.4%), hyperglycaemia (34.9%) and nausea (33.0%) in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, and anaemia (45.6%), fatigue (31.3%), alopecia (30.0%), and diarrhoea (21.9%) in the paclitaxel alone arm. There were 307 (95.6%) patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 134 (83.8%) patients in the paclitaxel alone arm with at least 1 treatment-related TEAE. The most common treatment related TEAEs were diarrhoea (33.3%), hyperglycaemia (31.2%), and anaemia (30.2%) in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, and anaemia (30.0%), alopecia (28.8%), and fatigue (25.0%) in the paclitaxel alone arm. Grade >=3 TEAEs occurred in 281 (87.5%) patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 95 (59.4%) patients in the paclitaxel alone arm, of which 228 (71.0%) patients (buparlisib + paclitaxel) and 54 (33.8%) patients (paclitaxel alone) had treatment-related Grade >=3 TEAEs. In the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, based on the highest grade experienced by each patient, the most common Grade 4 TEAEs were neutropenia (2.2%), neutrophil count decreased (1.9%), and lymphocyte count decreased (1.6%), and the most common Grade 3 TEAEs were white blood cell count decreased (11.5%), neutrophil count decreased (11.2%), and hyperglycaemia (10.3%). In the paclitaxel alone arm, based on the highest grade experienced by each patient, the most common Grade 4 TEAEs were cerebrovascular accident, lymphocyte count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, and sepsis (1.3% each), and the most common Grade 3 TEAEs were anaemia (12.5%), pneumonia (7.5%), and neutropenia (6.3%). In the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, 46/321 (14.3%) patients had at least 1 Grade 5 (fatal) TEAE and 7/321 (2.2%) patients each had at least 1 Grade 5 (fatal) TEAE assessed as related to buparlisib and/or paclitaxel. The most common fatal TEAEs in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm were pneumonia (1.9%) an tumour haermorrhage (1.2%) and the most common treatment-related fatal TEAE was pneumonitis (0.6%). In the paclitaxel alone arm, 11/160 (6.9%) patients had at least 1 Grade 5 (fatal) TEAE. The most common fatal TEAE in the paclitaxel alone arm was acute respiratory failure (1.9%). One patient had a treatment-related fatal TEAE of pulmonary sepsis. There were 208 (64.8%) patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 65 (40.6%) patients the paclitaxel alone arm with at least 1 SAE, of which 115 (35.8%) patients (buparlisib + paclitaxel) and 16 (10.0%) patients (paclitaxel alone) had at least 1 treatment-related SAE. In the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, the most common SAEs were pneumonia (11.2%) and hyperglycaemia (4.4%) and the most common treatment-related SAEs were pneumonia (5.6%) and hyperglycaemia (4.4%). In the paclitaxel alone arm, the most common SAEs were pneumonia (8.1%) and tumour haemorrhage (3.1%) and the most common treatment related SAEs were pneumonia and fatigue (1.3% each). There were 283 (88.2%) patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 120 (75.0%) patients in the paclitaxel alone arm who experienced at least 1 AESI. The most common AESIs were diarrhoea (43.0%) and hyperglycaemia (34.9%) in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and alopecia (30.0%) and diarrhoea (21.9%) in the paclitaxel alone arm. In the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm, there were 121 (37.7%) and 113 (35.2%) patients who had at least 1 TEAE that led to discontinuation of buparlisib and paclitaxel, respectively. The most common TEAEs that led to buparlisib discontinuation were pneumonia (3.4%) and fatigue (2.8%) and the most common TEAEs that led to paclitaxel discontinuation were pneumonia (2.8%) and asthenia (2.5%). In the paclitaxel alone arm, there were 27 (16.9%) patients who had at least 1 TEAE that led to discontinuation of paclitaxel. The most common TEAEs that led to paclitaxel discontinuation were asthenia, neuropathy peripheral, neurotoxicity, neutropenia, peripheral sensory neuropathy, and hypertension (1.3% each). With the exception of the reported laboratory-associated TEAEs, there were no remarkable or concerning results noted in any laboratory results, vital signs, physical examinations, or other safety assessments. |
|
The study did not meet the primary endpoint of OS. As of the data cut-off, 260 (80.5%) patients in the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 135 (82.3%) patients in the paclitaxel alone arm died, with disease progression being the most common cause of death. The median OS was 9.63 months (95% CI: 8.25, 11.20)for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 9.72 months (95% CI: 8.34, 11.70) for the paclitaxel alone arm. The hazard ratio (HR) was 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83, 1.26; p = 0.85). Since the primary endpoint of OS was not met, no formal statistical testing was performed for the key secondary endpoints of PFS by IRRC assessment and ORR by IRRC assessment. Based on IRRC assessment, median PFS was 4.14 (95% CI: 3.29, 4.27) months for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 4.11 (95% CI: 2.79, 4.17) months for the paclitaxel alone arm, with a HR of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.77, 1.22; nominal p = 0.77); ORR was 30.3% (95% CI: 25.4, 35.7) for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 20.7% (95% CI: 14.8, 27.7) for the paclitaxel alone arm; the difference in ORR between the treatment arms was 9.6% (95% CI: 1.3, 17.3; nominal p = 0.02); and median DoR was 5.55 (95% CI: 4.17, 6.97) months for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 9.10 (95% CI: 4.17, 12.45) months for the paclitaxel alone arm, with a HR of 1.48 (95% CI: 0.893, 2.44; nominal p = 0.12). Based on Investigator assessment, median PFS was 4.30 (95% CI: 3.68, 5.52) months for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 4.17 (95% CI: 3.94, 4.99) months for the paclitaxel alone arm, with a HR of 0.92 (95% CI: 0.74, 1.14; nominal p = 0.43); ORR was 29.7% (95% CI: 24.8, 35.0) for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 24.4% (95% CI: 18.0, 31.7) for the paclitaxel alone arm; the difference in ORR between the treatment arms was 5.3% (95% CI: -3.2, 13.3; nominal p = 0.22); and median DoR was 6.97 (95% CI: 6.05, 8.31) months for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 6.70 (95% CI: 4.17, 7.56) months for the paclitaxel alone arm, with a HR of 0.97 (95% CI: 0.63, 1.49; nominal p = 0.88). |
|
The study did not meet the primary endpoint of OS. The median OS was 9.63 months (95% CI: 8.25, 11.20)for the buparlisib + paclitaxel arm and 9.72 months (95% CI:8.34, 11.70) for the paclitaxel alone arm. HR was 1.02 (95% CI:0.83, 1.26; p = 0.85). Overall, while buparlisib in combination with paclitaxel was associated with manageable safety concerns, the clinical benefit was limited, highlighting the need for further investigation to determine patient subgroups that may derive greater therapeutic advantage. |
|
Feb. 27, 2026 |
|
Feb. 27, 2026 |
No |
|
https://jrct.mhlw.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2011210034 |
Kanmuri Kazuhiro |
||
PharmaLex Japan Inc. |
||
Shibuya SOLASTA 3F, 1-21-1, Dogenzaka, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan 150-0043 |
||
+81-3-4590-9005 |
||
kazuhiro.kanmuri@cencora.com |
||
Kanmuri Kazuhiro |
||
PharmaLex Japan Inc. |
||
Shibuya SOLASTA 3F, 1-21-1, Dogenzaka, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, Japan 150-0043 |
||
+81-3-4590-9005 |
||
kazuhiro.kanmuri@cencora.com |
Complete |
Feb. 25, 2021 |
||
| July. 01, 2021 | ||
| 483 | ||
Interventional |
||
randomized controlled trial |
||
open(masking not used) |
||
active control |
||
parallel assignment |
||
treatment purpose |
||
1. Aged >=18 years old. |
||
1. Patient has received previous treatment with any protein kinase B (PKB/AKT), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, or phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase (PI3K) pathway inhibitors. |
||
| 18age old over | ||
| No limit | ||
Both |
||
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma |
||
arm A:Daily buparlisib (100 mg) in combination with weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m2) |
||
To assess the OS of buparlisib in combination with paclitaxel compared to paclitaxel alone in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC. |
||
1. To evaluate additional efficacy parameters: progression free survival (PFS), ORR, and DoR, by the Investigator and Independent Radiological Review Committee (IRRC). |
||
| Adlai Nortye USA Inc., |
| Hokkaido University Hospital Institutional Review Board | |
| Kita 14, Nishi 5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido | |
+81-11-706-7061 |
|
| Approval | |
Feb. 16, 2021 |
| NCT04338399 | |
| ClinicalTrials.gov |
United States/Canada/Europe/Asia/Australia |